On March 13, 2010 19:10:56 Jo Shields wrote:
> I spoke with Ganneff (i think, or someone else in #debian-ftp), who
> flat-out said he'd REJECT it if it contained as much bundled stuff as
> it does.
>
> I agree with your points though. removing what's already in the
> archive might be a good plan if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/03/2010 22:52, Christopher Martin wrote:
> Has anyone actually explained the situation to the ftp-masters and asked
> for an opinion/exemption? It seems that moonlight in Debian is being
> given up on rather easily.
>
> Either an effort should b
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 18:51 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:58:31PM +, Jo Shields wrote:
> > > I don't know how to make this packageable, given the bundling
> > > restriction.
> >
> > Since it doesn't sound like solveable in a timely manner, would it
> > be possible t
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 13:15 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Package: moonlight-plugin-mozilla
> Severity: wishlist
>
> please package the new upstream release 1.9.2
We don't intend to package the preview releases. Firstly, they need SVN
Mono in order to compile. Secondly, they're horribly unstable r
Package: moonlight-plugin-mozilla
Severity: wishlist
please package the new upstream release 1.9.2
TIA
cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
5 matches
Mail list logo
