Florian Weimer wrote:
* MJ Ray:
cate wrote:
Eugen Dedu wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
I think there is a problem in terminology. AFAIK (but IANAL), the
any use doesn't include distribution of software.
For this reason I think it is safe to
Hi,
We have a bug report,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
of various plugins of opal package, and I do not know if the licenses
involved are DFSG-free. Could you please tell me if these plugins are
allowed to be in debian main?
Thank you,
--
Eugen Dedu
Eugen Dedu wrote:
Hi,
We have a bug report,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
of various plugins of opal package, and I do not know if the licenses
involved are DFSG-free. Could you please tell me if these plugins are
allowed to be in debian main?
The
cate wrote:
Eugen Dedu wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
I think there is a problem in terminology. AFAIK (but IANAL), the
any use doesn't include distribution of software.
For this reason I think it is safe to classify it as non distributable,
* MJ Ray:
cate wrote:
Eugen Dedu wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
I think there is a problem in terminology. AFAIK (but IANAL), the
any use doesn't include distribution of software.
For this reason I think it is safe to classify it as non
5 matches
Mail list logo