Bug#535218: apt-get / aptitude segfault when Cache-Limit is too small

2009-07-22 Thread Michael Vogt
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 03:38:06PM +0100, Steve Cotton wrote: package apt severity 535218 important merge 295051 535218 thanks That is no solution. libapt should never ever ever ever segfault. [..] That is likely to make this segfault unreproducible. It's not a fix to this bug; but

Bug#535218: apt-get / aptitude segfault when Cache-Limit is too small

2009-07-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hans-J. Ullrich hans.ullr...@loop.de writes: Workaround Just enter this into /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20archive: APT::Cache-Limit 1; Worked well for me. Otherwise: You are right, there is NO apt.conf any more! Good luck! Hans That is no solution. libapt should never ever ever

Bug#535218: apt-get / aptitude segfault when Cache-Limit is too small

2009-07-20 Thread Steve Cotton
package apt severity 535218 important merge 295051 535218 thanks That is no solution. libapt should never ever ever ever segfault. JackYF wrote a patch that completely replaces the Dynamic MMap code (it's discussed in #474947). That is likely to make this segfault unreproducible. It's not a

Bug#535218: apt-get / aptitude segfault when Cache-Limit is too small

2009-07-17 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Workaround Just enter this into /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20archive: APT::Cache-Limit 1; Worked well for me. Otherwise: You are right, there is NO apt.conf any more! Good luck! Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#535218: apt-get / aptitude segfault when Cache-Limit is too small

2009-07-03 Thread Gustaw Smolarczyk
Same problem here. I've just increased APT::Cache-Limit and the problem's gone, but I think too that the problem must be fixed in repo (just changing the default) or provide users better messages in case of too small amount of cache (not just SEGV). This problem is caused in amd64 by i386

Bug#535218: apt-get / aptitude segfault when Cache-Limit is too small

2009-07-02 Thread Drew Parsons
But apt should increases its default size so most people can stick with that even with ia32-apt-get installed. Aye, I think that's the important thing. The common user will be terrified by the warnings or segfaults, and at the same time they are well likely to be wanting ia32-libs-tools