* Julian Andres Klode | 2010-06-27 21:14:12 [+0200]:
Well, you used malloc() instead of new. And it should be a bzr merge
directive against the debian-experimental-ma branch:
http://bzr.debian.org/apt/apt/debian-experimental-ma/
On the other hand if you don't want it, don't take it, I did my
On Mo, 2010-06-28 at 22:38 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Julian Andres Klode | 2010-06-27 21:14:12 [+0200]:
Well, you used malloc() instead of new. And it should be a bzr merge
directive against the debian-experimental-ma branch:
* Julian Andres Klode | 2010-06-26 20:31:34 [+0200]:
Your patch does not make much sense. APT is written in C++, but you are
writing raw C code (and use different function naming style).
The function's name can be renmaned to what you want. Yes it is pure C
and I kept it simple and cloned the
On So, 2010-06-27 at 19:29 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Julian Andres Klode | 2010-06-26 20:31:34 [+0200]:
Your patch does not make much sense. APT is written in C++, but you are
writing raw C code (and use different function naming style).
The function's name can be renmaned to
tags 547724 + patch
thanks
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2010-06-23 21:37:26 [+0200]:
-i$arch while resolving deps. So I guess I sneak some informations
during the build-process and hack the compare into
debListParser::ParseDepends().
The patch attached does the work.
Sebastian
From
tags 547724 - patch
thanks
On Sa, 2010-06-26 at 19:15 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
tags 547724 + patch
thanks
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2010-06-23 21:37:26 [+0200]:
-i$arch while resolving deps. So I guess I sneak some informations
during the build-process and hack the
On Sa, 2010-06-26 at 20:31 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
tags 547724 - patch
thanks
On Sa, 2010-06-26 at 19:15 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
tags 547724 + patch
thanks
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2010-06-23 21:37:26 [+0200]:
-i$arch while resolving deps. So I
* Julian Andres Klode | 2009-09-22 07:42:04 [+0200]:
Build-Depends: libgl1-mesa-dev [any-i386] | libgl1-mesa-dev [i386]
I thought those wildcards are only for debian/control and will be replaced
by dpkg automatically. But yes, we need support for it sometime.
I was looking at this. I guess
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 01:42:04 Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.23.1
Severity: normal
When performing 'apt-get build-dep sbuild-dependencies-resolver', it will
not install libgl1-mesa-dev on an
Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.23.1
Severity: normal
When performing 'apt-get build-dep sbuild-dependencies-resolver', it will not
install libgl1-mesa-dev on an i386 machine. Yet if I
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.23.1
Severity: normal
When performing 'apt-get build-dep sbuild-dependencies-resolver', it will not
install libgl1-mesa-dev on an i386 machine. Yet if I change the Build-Depends
field to,
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.23.1
Severity: normal
If I have a Sources file I'm experimenting with that has this entry,
Package: sbuild-dependencies-resolver
Binary: sbuild-dependencies-resolver
Version: 0.invalid.0
Priority: extra
Section: utils
Maintainer: Debian
12 matches
Mail list logo