Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.4
Severity: minor
When using in debian/rules:
override_CH_COMMAND:
Lintian displays warnings:
debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends (= 7.0.50~)
if debian/control reads:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7)
SUGGESITON
The warning
Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net writes:
When using in debian/rules:
override_CH_COMMAND:
Lintian displays warnings:
debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends (= 7.0.50~)
if debian/control reads:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7)
SUGGESITON
The warning is
Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
That doesn't make any sense to me. Why would we replace a tag which is
accurate with one that isn't? Why is an incorrect dependency on = 7.1
more descriptive to the reader than a correct dependency on = 7.0.50~?
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
The debhelper is already in version of 7.4.15 in Debian/testing, so
perhaps the message could be relaxed to a nearest round number:
debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends (= 7.1)
That doesn't make any sense to me. Why would we replace a
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
debhelper (7.0.50) unstable; urgency=low
* This release is designed to be easily backportable to stable,
to support the new style of rules file that I expect many packages will
use.
backports.org I think now has an even newer version, but
5 matches
Mail list logo
