Quoting Jon Marler (jmar...@debian.org):
Hello Jon,
Have you been able to sort things out?
if the FTBFS is #584745, I think the report is too incomplete for
being properly processed. The bug submitter never followed up,
also. I'd suggest tagging moreinfo and ignoring ATM.
It's a valid
Quoting Jonathan Marler (jmar...@debian.org):
Ping. This review process happened about 3 months ago. Would it be
possible to consider an upload with these changes applied?
I begin to think about one of my usual l10n NMU but wanted to first
discuss with package maintainer(s) in case
Hello Jon,
Have you been able to sort things out?
if the FTBFS is #584745, I think the report is too incomplete for
being properly processed. The bug submitter never followed up,
also. I'd suggest tagging moreinfo and ignoring ATM.
It's a valid bug. It is super easy to reproduce ... just try
Ping. This review process happened about 3 months ago. Would it be
possible to consider an upload with these changes applied?
I begin to think about one of my usual l10n NMU but wanted to first
discuss with package maintainer(s) in case something else is holding
off a new upload.
I would
Quoting Jonathan Marler (jmar...@debian.org):
Ping. This review process happened about 3 months ago. Would it be
possible to consider an upload with these changes applied?
I begin to think about one of my usual l10n NMU but wanted to first
discuss with package maintainer(s) in case
5 matches
Mail list logo
