> But what do you say by "clone this bug" ?
> * It there a procedure to do this ?
> * Or it's a administrative option I don't have access to as a user ?
> * Or I have to manually copy the report into a new one ?
Please read http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
--
Otavio Salvador
Colin Watson a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
So even if the primary cause is now fixed, from a quality view, this bug
is still not in the state to be closed. Or should other bug be opened
for those point ?
If you believe parted_server (whic
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> So even if the primary cause is now fixed, from a quality view, this bug
> is still not in the state to be closed. Or should other bug be opened
> for those point ?
If you believe parted_server (which is in the partman-
Hello Jean-Christian,
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> In http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.parted.bugs/10180 Jim Meyering
> provided a patch that solve the problem. After verification, he commited it
> into git://git.debian.org/git/parted/parted.git:
>
> com
In http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.parted.bugs/10180 Jim
Meyering provided a patch that solve the problem. After verification, he
commited it into git://git.debian.org/git/parted/parted.git:
commit 9f5b0608611eed40ef33be2096f5d482710602e5
Author: Jim Meyering
Date: Tue Nov 9 10:25:36
It seem that the only maintained source archive for GNU parted is
git://git.debian.org/git/parted/parted.git . Right ?
I managed to find that the bug was introduced by this commit:
commit c79d91ec71882a1673daae0482aa90c514c63cc1
Author: Jim Meyering
Date: Tue Mar 30 16:50:59 2010 +0200
reassign 602568 parted
severity 602568 important
tags 602568 patch
thanks
Quoting Jean-Christian de Rivaz (j...@eclis.ch):
> Please find in attachment my current proposition of patch. It remove
> the obsolete -fgnu89-inline and use the same flags for build-udeb
> than for build-deb to get the -O2
Please find in attachment my current proposition of patch. It remove the
obsolete -fgnu89-inline and use the same flags for build-udeb than for
build-deb to get the -O2 optimization.
This work, but I still don't understand why the code fail without
optimization.
Regards,
Jean-Christian de
I now have a backtrace:
Backtrace has 20 calls on stack:
20: ./libparted/.libs/libparted.so.0(ped_assert+0x28) [0xb77d9073]
19: ./libparted/.libs/libparted.so.0(ped_geometry_new+0x5a) [0xb77e2aed]
18: ./libparted/.libs/libparted.so.0(ped_geometry_duplicate+0x73)
[0xb77e2bc6]
17: ./libpar
Interesting finding:
libparted.so.0.0.1 (from *.deb) != libparted.so.0.0.1 (from *.udeb)
I have do this:
apt-get source parted
cd parted-2.3/
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us
cd ..
mkdir install-bin
dpkg -x libparted0-udeb_2.3-3_i386.udeb install-bin/
dpkg -x parted-udeb_2.3-3_i386.udeb ins
Now Squeeze is installed into the notepad and I can test the parted
2.3-3 that is available from it. No problem without partition of course,
bt the surprise is that it also have no issue with a FAT12 partition:
fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 5 MB, 5242880 bytes
1 heads, 10 sectors/track, 102
Can't easily find what's wrong into the parted-2.3/libparted code. But
GNU Parted 1.8.8 from a Lenny machine work on this disk:
parted /dev/sdb print
Error: Can't have the end before the start!
Model: disk2go PURE II (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 5243kB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partiti
I finally found the parted_servec.c into
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/partman-base . I think the problem is
in the OPEN command path for /dev/sdb:
void
command_open()
{
log("command_open()"); <=== found in the log
char *device;
scan_device_name();
if (1 !
Christian PERRIER a écrit :
Quoting Jean-Christian de Rivaz (j...@eclis.ch):
Unfortunately there is no /var/log/installer/ directory:
That dir exists on the installed system. As you couuldn't install, it
is indeed not there
ls -al /var/log
drwxr-xr-x2 root root 0 Nov 5
Quoting Jean-Christian de Rivaz (j...@eclis.ch):
> Unfortunately there is no /var/log/installer/ directory:
That dir exists on the installed system. As you couuldn't install, it
is indeed not there
>
> ls -al /var/log
> drwxr-xr-x2 root root 0 Nov 5 22:33 .
> drwxr-xr-x
Miguel Figueiredo a écrit :
A Sexta 05 Novembro 2010 23:06:26 Jean-Christian de Rivaz você escreveu:
[...]
How can I get more debug informations from partman to go deeper into the
analysis ?
[...]
You can check /var/log/installer/partman and the syslog on that location can
be useful too.
A Sexta 05 Novembro 2010 23:06:26 Jean-Christian de Rivaz você escreveu:
[...]
> How can I get more debug informations from partman to go deeper into the
> analysis ?
[...]
You can check /var/log/installer/partman and the syslog on that location can
be useful too.
--
Melhores cumprimentos/B
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: disk2go PURE II USB stick
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_beta1/i386/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-beta1-i386-businesscard.iso
Date: 06 nov 2010
Machine: Asus EeePC 1015PE
Processor: Intel Atom N450
Memory: 2GB
Partitions:
Disk
18 matches
Mail list logo
