On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:10:31PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:07:22PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > First, I think that we might just end up removing corekeeper entirely,
> >
> > Hmm, I think it sounds like a useful package. I was thinking about
>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:07:22PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > First, I think that we might just end up removing corekeeper entirely,
>
> Hmm, I think it sounds like a useful package. I was thinking about
> using it on workstations with NFS homes to keep core dumps of several
Hi Ben,
Ben Pfaff wrote:
> First, I think that we might just end up removing corekeeper entirely,
Hmm, I think it sounds like a useful package. I was thinking about
using it on workstations with NFS homes to keep core dumps of several
GB away from NFS mounted directories.
I also thought about ad
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 06:39:50PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: corekeeper
> Version: 1.1.0~pre2-2
> Severity: important
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
>
> Setting up corekeeper (1.1.0~pre2-2) ...
> Initializing core dump location...:/etc/init.d/corekeeper: 64: c
Package: corekeeper
Version: 1.1.0~pre2-2
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Setting up corekeeper (1.1.0~pre2-2) ...
Initializing core dump location...:/etc/init.d/corekeeper: 64: cannot create
/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern: Directory nonexistent
failed!
in
5 matches
Mail list logo
