On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:10:31PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:07:22PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
Ben Pfaff wrote:
First, I think that we might just end up removing corekeeper entirely,
Hmm, I think it sounds like a useful package. I was thinking about
using it
Package: corekeeper
Version: 1.1.0~pre2-2
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Setting up corekeeper (1.1.0~pre2-2) ...
Initializing core dump location...:/etc/init.d/corekeeper: 64: cannot create
/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern: Directory nonexistent
failed!
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 06:39:50PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
Package: corekeeper
Version: 1.1.0~pre2-2
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Setting up corekeeper (1.1.0~pre2-2) ...
Initializing core dump location...:/etc/init.d/corekeeper: 64: cannot
Hi Ben,
Ben Pfaff wrote:
First, I think that we might just end up removing corekeeper entirely,
Hmm, I think it sounds like a useful package. I was thinking about
using it on workstations with NFS homes to keep core dumps of several
GB away from NFS mounted directories.
I also thought about
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:07:22PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
Ben Pfaff wrote:
First, I think that we might just end up removing corekeeper entirely,
Hmm, I think it sounds like a useful package. I was thinking about
using it on workstations with NFS homes to keep core dumps of several
GB
5 matches
Mail list logo