On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:30:13PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> I think it might be
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-desktop/packages/tags/desktop-base/6.0.5/splash/nightly-splash.png
>
> (sorry it seems that inline view is broken there).
Just for reference: that can be fixed by run
On Wed, June 29, 2011 4:39 am, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ Adding ftpmaster to Cc. ftpmaster: please check bug log for context ]
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:32:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> I think Iâm going to leave the Debian Project Leader deal with this.
>> Stefano, Iâll let
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:32:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 17:44 -0400, Karen Sandler a écrit :
> > Ah, I see the confusion here - the logos identified on that page are the
> > marks that have been registered, but GNOME, like Debian, has trademark
> > right
[ Adding ftpmaster to Cc. ftpmaster: please check bug log for context ]
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:32:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I think I’m going to leave the Debian Project Leader deal with this.
> Stefano, I’ll let you read the bug log . Maybe you’ll want to ask the
> FTP masters to
Hi,
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 17:44 -0400, Karen Sandler a écrit :
> Ah, I see the confusion here - the logos identified on that page are the
> marks that have been registered, but GNOME, like Debian, has trademark
> rights in logos that it uses even if it hasn't registered them. And the
> usage po
Hi Josselin,
I'm a bit new to GNOME (just started as ED last week), so bear with me. I
do have a legal background though, so hopefully we can get this sorted out
in a quick and friendly way!
On Tue, June 28, 2011 10:31 am, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 28 juin 2011 Ã 15:06 +0100, Bastien No
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 15:06 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > This means we will have to remove any files containing the logo from our
> > packages, per the Debian guidelines. I’d really like to avoid that since
> > the impact is far more important than the pair of packages we are
> > talking
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 15:58 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 14:18 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > > I think Francesco is talking about things like the logo on
> > > http://pkg-gnome.alioth.debian.org/
> > > (I don’t find it in desktop-base though, maybe we ship it in
>
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 14:18 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > I think Francesco is talking about things like the logo on
> > http://pkg-gnome.alioth.debian.org/
> > (I don’t find it in desktop-base though, maybe we ship it in
> > gnome-icon-theme instead.)
>
> This sort of thing is absolutely
On mar., 2011-06-28 at 15:01 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 13:45 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > > It is my impression by reading the guidelines that the foot logo without
> > > the GNOME text (as shipped by gnome-about) isn’t subject to the same
> > > terms as the o
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 15:01 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 13:45 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > > It is my impression by reading the guidelines that the foot logo without
> > > the GNOME text (as shipped by gnome-about) isn’t subject to the same
> > > terms as the on
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 13:45 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > It is my impression by reading the guidelines that the foot logo without
> > the GNOME text (as shipped by gnome-about) isn’t subject to the same
> > terms as the one with the text (as shipped by gnome-icon-theme). This
> > would be
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 14:20 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 10:48 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > > The "desktop-base" Debian package includes an image which is derived
> > > from the GNOME foot Logo.
> > > I am currently trying to properly document the copyright and l
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 10:48 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > The "desktop-base" Debian package includes an image which is derived
> > from the GNOME foot Logo.
> > I am currently trying to properly document the copyright and license of
> > the GNOME foot Logo, but I wasn't able to find offici
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 22:18 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hello GNOME foundation licensing team,
> I am a user and contributor of the Debian distribution.
>
> I have a question about the GNOME foot Logo.
>
> The "desktop-base" Debian package includes an image which is derived
> from the GNOME fo
Hello GNOME foundation licensing team,
I am a user and contributor of the Debian distribution.
I have a question about the GNOME foot Logo.
The "desktop-base" Debian package includes an image which is derived
from the GNOME foot Logo.
I am currently trying to properly document the copyright and l
Hello GNOME foundation licensing team,
I am a user and contributor of the Debian distribution.
I have a question about the GNOME foot Logo.
The "desktop-base" Debian package includes an image which is derived
from the GNOME foot Logo.
I am currently trying to properly document the copyright and l
Hello GNOME foundation licensing team,
I am a user and contributor of the Debian distribution.
I have a question about the GNOME foot Logo.
The "desktop-base" Debian package includes an image which is derived
from the GNOME foot Logo.
I am currently trying to properly document the copyright and l
18 matches
Mail list logo
