On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 10:54 -0700, Mathew Eis wrote:
I believe I may have a patch for this in upstream SVN; please test and
let me know how it works out.
That worked well, thanks.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
I believe I may have a patch for this in upstream SVN; please test and let me
know how it works out.
Thanks,
-Mathew Eis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
severity 612698 important
thanks
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:27 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
As you can see in these two build logs, icns2png fails on armel and
sparc due to a bus/alignment error and something that looks like
misparsing of the file. Other architectures are fine.
It appears that only
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:27 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
sparc due to a bus/alignment error
After recompiling without optimisation, there is no Bus error, so this
like the other one is a compiler optimisation bug.
Here is the backtrace (with -O2) from gdb on smetana (sparc):
#0
Package: icnsutils
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: broken on armel/sparc
As you can see in these two build logs, icns2png fails on armel and
sparc due to a bus/alignment error and something that looks like
misparsing of the file. Other architectures are fine.
Hi pabs,
Does Debian have access to a armel/sparc box that I can have you run
some tests on?
Thanks,
-Mathew Eis
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
Package: icnsutils
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: broken on armel/sparc
As you can see in
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 19:25 -0700, Mathew Eis wrote:
Does Debian have access to a armel/sparc box that I can have you run
some tests on?
As you can see at [1] there are several. I tried this on my phone[2][3]
which also runs Debian armel and found that compiling libicns without
optimisation
7 matches
Mail list logo
