Well OK, but e.g., the
Package: info
Priority: important
Section: doc
package doesn't seem to have that many problems.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 18:59 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Well OK, but e.g., the
Package: info
Priority: important
Section: doc
package doesn't seem to have that many problems.
GNU Info isn't the same thing as Monodoc in any way, shape, or form.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Package: monodoc-browser
Version: 2.6.2-3
Can't these be compiled at the developer's end, and have them sent ready
made, instead of having each users machine crank for many minutes,
spewing out tons of errors?
.SqlTypes.SqlChars.Conversion, with xpath:
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 23:08 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Package: monodoc-browser
Version: 2.6.2-3
Can't these be compiled at the developer's end, and have them sent ready
made, instead of having each users machine crank for many minutes,
spewing out tons of errors?
4 matches
Mail list logo