Hi everyone,
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 15:39 -0400, Keith Lawson wrote:
On 4/4/2011 at 3:06 PM, in message 20110404190614.gk2...@ktnx.net,
Damyan
Ivanov d...@debian.org wrote:
-=| Keith Lawson, Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:03:21PM -0400 |=-
I've discovered that I can fix mod_perl 2 by removing
Are we sure this isn't another one of those libdb/libapr breakages?
It would be great if we can recompile everything using libdb-dev (
5.1) anyway (see my recent post to debian-release).
O.
--
Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org
http://blog.rfc1925.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Are we sure this isn't another one of those libdb/libapr breakages?
Our mod_perl code is using GNU DBM, not Berkely DB.
I've tested building libphp5.so from the php.net source for php-5.3.3 and the
problem still persists with my own compiled library.
I've also tried to get a backtrace
I've discovered that I can fix mod_perl 2 by removing libapache2-mod-php5.
Looking at the files installed by libapache2-mod-php5 I don't see anything that
should break tie() in mod_perl when that package is installed but it definitely
is.
Can this bug report be moved over to
reassign 620550 libapache2-mod-php5
thanks
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:03:21 -0400, Keith Lawson wrote:
I've discovered that I can fix mod_perl 2 by removing libapache2-mod-php5.
Looking at the files installed by libapache2-mod-php5 I don't see anything
that should break tie() in mod_perl when
-=| Keith Lawson, Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:03:21PM -0400 |=-
I've discovered that I can fix mod_perl 2 by removing
libapache2-mod-php5. Looking at the files installed by
libapache2-mod-php5 I don't see anything that should break tie() in
mod_perl when that package is installed but it
On 4/4/2011 at 3:06 PM, in message 20110404190614.gk2...@ktnx.net, Damyan
Ivanov d...@debian.org wrote:
-=| Keith Lawson, Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:03:21PM -0400 |=-
I've discovered that I can fix mod_perl 2 by removing
libapache2-mod-php5. Looking at the files installed by
7 matches
Mail list logo
