Hi,
Roland Hieber wrote:
> I guess this bug is no longer applicable, conkeror/1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1
> currently does depend on xulrunner-2.0 (besides others),
IIRC that was not the point of the bug report.
It was about which xulrunner version is the _first_ (or even worse,
the sole) alternative
Package: conkeror
Followup-For: Bug #622763
Dear Maintainer,
I guess this bug is no longer applicable, conkeror/1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1
currently does depend on xulrunner-2.0 (besides others), and by the way,
xulrunner-2.0 is no longer present in the archive [1]. So please consider
closing this bu
tag 622763 +wontfix -patch
severity 622763 wishlist
kthxbye
Hi,
Martin Pitt wrote:
> conkeror should depend on xulrunner-2.0 (i. e. the latest version)
> first
No, at least not yet. xulrunner-2.0 in Debian is still in Experimental
and xulrunner-1.9.1 is the one which is in Unstable. The version
Package: conkeror
Version: 0.9.3+git110307-2
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch natty
Hello,
conkeror should depend on xulrunner-2.0 (i. e. the latest version)
first (or even better: only), as otherwise this can easily lead to
people installing an
4 matches
Mail list logo
