Bug#628018: ship mutt integration code (AKA "mutt-notmuch")

2011-05-28 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:12AM -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > The question I meant to ask is whether you could provide the snippet I > should add to notmuch/debian/control for this package. I can get some > fields easily enough, but could use some help on a couple of them: Sorry, I've interpreted

Bug#628018: ship mutt integration code (AKA "mutt-notmuch")

2011-05-27 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 27 May 2011 15:43:40 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > I didn't dare asking :), but yeah, absolutely. I also think that a > "contrib/" dir is the way to go and I hope it will encourage other > people to contribute their notmuch hacks. Excellent. I'll do t

Bug#628018: ship mutt integration code (AKA "mutt-notmuch")

2011-05-27 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:26:57PM -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > I am totally glad to include the script in the notmuch source > repository, (maybe under a new "contrib" directory?). Would you feel > comfortable with maintaining it there? I didn't dare asking :), but yeah, absolutely. I also think t

Bug#628018: ship mutt integration code (AKA "mutt-notmuch")

2011-05-26 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 26 May 2011 14:50:50 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I've developed a while ago a tiny teeny script for integrating notmuch with a > Mutt-based workflow. Some rationale for it has been given at > http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2011/01/how_to_use_Notmuch_with_Mutt/ Very cool! I'll