On 2012-01-13 13:59, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
| * jaalto [2012-01-13 13:14:15 CET]:
| > On 2012-01-13 10:21, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
| > | Then please state it THERE, not HERE where the bugreport was about your
| > | confusion with not reading the documentation and wanting to have the
| > | intended wa
* jaalto [2012-01-13 13:14:15 CET]:
> On 2012-01-13 10:21, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> | Then please state it THERE, not HERE where the bugreport was about your
> | confusion with not reading the documentation and wanting to have the
> | intended way it works changed.
>
> In 653993 the bug was clos
On 2012-01-13 10:21, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
| Then please state it THERE, not HERE where the bugreport was about your
| confusion with not reading the documentation and wanting to have the
| intended way it works changed.
In 653993 the bug was closed with reasoning that with the suggested
change,
* jaalto [2012-01-13 06:30:50 CET]:
> On 2012-01-13 01:23, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> | No, you didn't. What you did is pulling the issue that you reported in
> | 654189 and got handled through that by upstream already into this very
> | bugreport as a duplicate
>
> 654189
>
> The gitol
On 2012-01-13 01:23, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
| No, you didn't. What you did is pulling the issue that you reported in
| 654189 and got handled through that by upstream already into this very
| bugreport as a duplicate
654189
The gitolite installation contains commands that are not used
tags 653993 - patch
thanks
* Jari Aalto [2012-01-13 00:05:36 CET]:
> 2012-01-12 19:41 Don Armstrong :
> >
> >"Unsuccessful stat on filename containing newline at
> >/usr/share/gitolite/sshkeys-lint line 142, <> line 29. file not
> >found:"
> >
> | If you disagree with the
tags 653993 + patch
thanks
2012-01-12 19:41 Don Armstrong :
>
>"Unsuccessful stat on filename containing newline at
>/usr/share/gitolite/sshkeys-lint line 142, <> line 29. file not
>found:"
>
| If you disagree with the maintainer, then your choices are to either
| attempt t
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, jaalto wrote:
> If you mean that this bug should be merged to 653994, perhaps that
> is the correct action. I'm not sure why the bug should stay closed
> for reported error:
>
>"Unsuccessful stat on filename containing newline at
>/usr/share/gitolite/sshkeys-li
| >
| > The bug 653993
| >
| > Running the program with a legal argument causes it to die with a
| > cryptic error message.
|
| No, it's not, it's:
|
| Subject: Re: Bug#653993: {reopen] gitolite: gl-setup thinks admin_name is The
file name of SSH key
That is the bug
gal argument causes it to die with a
> cryptic error message.
No, it's not, it's:
Subject: Re: Bug#653993: {reopen] gitolite: gl-setup thinks admin_name is The
file name of SSH key
Please check your facts.
> To my understanding it is not correct to close such bugs, thu
On 2012-01-12 09:31, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
| * Jari Aalto [2012-01-11 13:25:21 CET]:
| > reopen 653993
| > thanks
|
| Thanks for yet another BTS abuse.
The bug 653993
Running the program with a legal argument causes it to die with a
cryptic error message.
To my understanding it is not
reopen 653993
thanks
| Another abuse of the BTS. No rationale whatsoever
Rationale was in the reopen control message. See:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=21;bug=653993
a) the behavior of the script is unexpected
b) there are no warnings (or error checks)
c) pr
12 matches
Mail list logo
