On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 06:03:02PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> There is discussion about handling system users
> (http://bugs.debian.org/621833) and consensus seems to be to keep system
> users on package remove/purge to avoid reuse of the uid, but lock them
> (yet unspecified how to do this).
On 2012-03-04 17:20, Michael Meskes wrote:
>> I'm talking about the package that is responsible for that file and
>> needs to clean this up on remove/purge.
>
> Well the directory is the home directory of the user created in bucardo's
> postinst. Removing that directory would leave a broken user a
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 03:21:19PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Do you think about file ownership/permissions as in chown/chgrp/chmod?
Yes.
> I'm talking about the package that is responsible for that file and
> needs to clean this up on remove/purge.
Well the directory is the home directory
On 2012-03-04 14:37, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 03:40:15PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> 0m24.6s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
>> /var/lib/bucardonot owned
>
> Who owns it?
Do you think about file ownership/permissions as in chown/chgrp/chmod?
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 03:40:15PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> 0m24.6s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
> /var/lib/bucardo not owned
Who owns it? I have yet to find a way to reproduce the problem. It works well
on all my tests. This directory is generated and not touch
Package: bucardo
Version: 4.4.8-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-
6 matches
Mail list logo
