Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-24 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [120120 15:41]: In case the version in Squeeze would be considered free also all other versions are free (which would be *really* good news). So please, please prove me wrong in my opinion that this database is not distributable. I'm specifically

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Alexander, On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 06:34:42PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: I'm not an FTP master, though. As far as I can see, the package is indeed distributable, but not fit for main. Thanks for inspecting the package. While this is not the best possible option it is at

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-24 Thread Eric MAEKER
Le 24 janv. 2012 à 20:58, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi Alexander, On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 06:34:42PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: I'm not an FTP master, though. As far as I can see, the package is indeed distributable, but not fit for main. Thanks for inspecting the package.

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, it turned out that the database which is used in freediams (file global_resources/databases/drugs/master.db) is a compilation of data with different licenses. Some of the original data have non-free or unclear licenses. After a discussion on the

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-20 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
clone 656573 -1 reassing -1 snapshot.debian.org thanks Hi! Am 20.01.2012 09:40, schrieb Andreas Tille: it turned out that the database which is used in freediams (file global_resources/databases/drugs/master.db) is a compilation of data with different licenses. Some of the original data

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-20 Thread Sebastian Hilbert
On Friday, January 20, 2012 09:40:18 AM Andreas Tille wrote: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, it turned out that the database which is used in freediams (file global_resources/databases/drugs/master.db) is a compilation of data with different licenses. Some of the original

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Alexander, On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:58:21AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: clone 656573 -1 reassing -1 snapshot.debian.org thanks Hi! Am 20.01.2012 09:40, schrieb Andreas Tille: it turned out that the database which is used in freediams (file

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastian, On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:58:42AM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote: it turned out that the database which is used in freediams (file global_resources/databases/drugs/master.db) is a compilation of data with different licenses. Some of the original data have non-free or

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-20 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:01:56AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: Which versions are affected? All? (In which case you might need to contact the stable release managers to get the removed from Squeeze, too). In CC. squeeze doesn't have a master.db. As for the other drugs/*.db I don't think

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:38:17PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:01:56AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: Which versions are affected? All? (In which case you might need to contact the stable release managers to get the removed from Squeeze, too). In CC. squeeze

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-20 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 03:26:08PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: Please seek for drugs/master.db to find the relevant licensing information about the compilation of data. As far as I understand upstream upstream the database in the old version is featuring the same data sources in older version