Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-05 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:40:51PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:58:30 +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: Package: luajit Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream In

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-04 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: Package: luajit Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but rather be made available via backports. Sooo, how is ulatencyd affected? It just

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:58:30 +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: Package: luajit Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but rather

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-03 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
clone 672657 -1 -2 -3 reassign -1 uwsgi retitle -1 uwsgi: Needs to switch from luajit to lua reassign -2 ulatencyd retitle -2 ulatencyd: Needs to switch from luajit to lua reassign -3 mudlet retitle -3 mudlet: Needs to switch from luajit to lua thanks On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:34:47PM +0200,

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-02 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Hi Enrico, On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: Package: luajit Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but rather be made available via backports. What makes luajit not

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-02 Thread Enrico Tassi
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:12:47PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but rather be made available via backports. What makes luajit not acceptable for Wheezy? That the upstream prefers not to have a beta version of luajit

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-02 Thread Enrico Tassi
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:12:47PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: uwsgi ulatencyd mudlet As I suspected all the dependencies are soft, so we can just drop them in favour of liblua5.1-0-dev. But of course these packages have to be uploaded to fix the issue. Cheers -- Enrico Tassi -- To

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-05-12 Thread Enrico Tassi
Package: luajit Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but rather be made available via backports. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),