Bug#685439: Processed: severity of 685439 is important

2014-03-24 Thread Christoph Martin
Sorry for that. I am too tired to read correctly. Am 24.03.2014 15:25, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:40 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> please look into the Bug report. There is a mail from tonight which >> seemed to come from you: > > Yes, now read what it say

Bug#685439: Processed: severity of 685439 is important

2014-03-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:40 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote: > Hi Ben, > > please look into the Bug report. There is a mail from tonight which > seemed to come from you: Yes, now read what it says. Ben. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#685439: Processed: severity of 685439 is important

2014-03-24 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Ben, please look into the Bug report. There is a mail from tonight which seemed to come from you: > Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2014 23:53:04 + > From b...@decadent.org.uk Sun Mar 23 23:53:04 2014 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Bug#685439: Processed: severity of 685439 is important

2014-03-24 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Ben, why did you set this bug report to grave? Christoph Am 24.03.2014 00:57, schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> severity 685439 important > Bug #685439 [apt-show-versions] Use of uninitialized value in hash element > Severity set to '

Bug#685439: Processed: severity of 685439 is important

2014-03-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:22 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote: > Hi Ben, > > why did you set this bug report to grave? I didn't. Ben. > Christoph > > Am 24.03.2014 00:57, schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: > > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > >> severity 685439 important >