Bug#688212: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2015-03-10 Thread Antoine Musso
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:38:02 +0200 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Raph Levien (raph.lev...@gmail.com): Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be considered the definitive one. Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant

Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread Christian PERRIER
(Raph, this comes from a bug report in Debian bug tracking system : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688212) Quoting Erik Bernstein (e...@fscking.org): Package: fonts-inconsolata Version: 001.010-4 Severity: normal Hi, I've noticed that in a few cases rxvt-unicode has

Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread erok
Hi Christian, Still, I'd be happy to package this new upstream versionif only I could find a place to download it. Try google web fonts: http://www.google.com/webfonts - Search for Inconsolata - Check both styles and click Add to Collection - Click Download Your Collection This should

Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread Raph Levien
Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be considered the definitive one. Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant advantage to people who have bold styling as part of their syntax highlighting. I really need to update my website but I'm kind of

Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread Paul Wise
Ugh at websites that require JavaScript to function at all. On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Raph Levien wrote: Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be considered the definitive one. Unfortunately Google are not distributing the source, which Debian has promised to do

Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 09:50:34AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Ugh at websites that require JavaScript to function at all. All fonts are available from the mercury repository, though Inconsolata sources are missing (the src directory contains a punch of vfb files that are of no use to us):

Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Raph Levien (raph.lev...@gmail.com): Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be considered the definitive one. Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant advantage to people who have bold styling as part of their syntax highlighting.

Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-20 Thread Erik Bernstein
Package: fonts-inconsolata Version: 001.010-4 Severity: normal Hi, I've noticed that in a few cases rxvt-unicode has problems with font fallback for some unicode characters with Inconsolata 1.010. You can reproduce the problem as follows: 1. open a terminal and run urxvt -fn