On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:38:02 +0200 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org
wrote:
Quoting Raph Levien (raph.lev...@gmail.com):
Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be
considered the definitive one.
Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant
(Raph, this comes from a bug report in Debian bug tracking system :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688212)
Quoting Erik Bernstein (e...@fscking.org):
Package: fonts-inconsolata
Version: 001.010-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
I've noticed that in a few cases rxvt-unicode has
Hi Christian,
Still, I'd be happy to package this new upstream versionif only I
could find a place to download it.
Try google web fonts:
http://www.google.com/webfonts
- Search for Inconsolata
- Check both styles and click Add to Collection
- Click Download Your Collection
This should
Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be
considered the definitive one.
Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant
advantage to people who have bold styling as part of their syntax
highlighting.
I really need to update my website but I'm kind of
Ugh at websites that require JavaScript to function at all.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Raph Levien wrote:
Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be considered
the definitive one.
Unfortunately Google are not distributing the source, which Debian has
promised to do
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 09:50:34AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Ugh at websites that require JavaScript to function at all.
All fonts are available from the mercury repository, though Inconsolata
sources are missing (the src directory contains a punch of vfb files
that are of no use to us):
Quoting Raph Levien (raph.lev...@gmail.com):
Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be
considered the definitive one.
Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant
advantage to people who have bold styling as part of their syntax
highlighting.
Package: fonts-inconsolata
Version: 001.010-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
I've noticed that in a few cases rxvt-unicode has problems with font
fallback for some unicode characters with Inconsolata 1.010.
You can reproduce the problem as follows:
1. open a terminal and run urxvt -fn
8 matches
Mail list logo