Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2013-03-17 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 + pending On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi all I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting problem with NFS mounts. Julien is this acceptable for a t-p-u upload? Regards, Salvatore Please go ahead.

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2013-03-17 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Jonathan On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 03:19:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 + pending On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi all I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting problem with NFS mounts. Julien

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2013-03-09 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi all I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting problem with NFS mounts. Julien is this acceptable for a t-p-u upload? Regards, Salvatore diff -u quota-4.00/debian/changelog quota-4.00/debian/changelog --- quota-4.00/debian/changelog +++ quota-4.00/debian/changelog

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2013-03-04 Thread Simon Kuhnle
Hi, On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:58:32PM -0800, Christoph Egger wrote: intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes: Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) : Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the whole new release? Where does fixing the XFS problem

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) : Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the whole new release? Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs in 4.01? As I understand it (and not being a member of the release team),

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2013-03-03 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes: Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) : Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the whole new release? Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs in 4.01? As I understand it (and

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2012-12-27 Thread Michael Meskes
Cc'ing Michael (maintainer of quota). Thanks, I didn't know a freeze exception for quota was asked for. Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the whole new release? Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs in 4.01? There are not a

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2012-12-26 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Julien Cc'ing Michael (maintainer of quota). On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 01:05:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: [...] Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the whole new release? I was looking at the bugs for release.debian.org for the wheezy release and noticed

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2012-12-26 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Julien On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 01:05:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: The changelog diff is weird: --- quota-4.00/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:01:05.0 + +++ quota-4.01/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:01:06.0 + @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -quota (4.00-4) unstable;

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2012-12-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 17:21:32 +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package quota http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/quota.html The new version fixes Debian bug #685356,

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2012-09-21 Thread Tobias Burnus
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package quota http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/quota.html The new version fixes Debian bug #685356, namely: repquota: Fix reporting for XFS Conversion to generic quota