Control: tag -1 + pending
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi all
I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting
problem with NFS mounts. Julien is this acceptable for a t-p-u upload?
Regards,
Salvatore
Please go ahead.
Hi Jonathan
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 03:19:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 + pending
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi all
I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting
problem with NFS mounts. Julien
Hi all
I have updated the proposed debdiff with also the patch for reporting
problem with NFS mounts. Julien is this acceptable for a t-p-u upload?
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -u quota-4.00/debian/changelog quota-4.00/debian/changelog
--- quota-4.00/debian/changelog
+++ quota-4.00/debian/changelog
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:58:32PM -0800, Christoph Egger wrote:
intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes:
Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) :
Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
whole new release?
Where does fixing the XFS problem
Hi,
Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) :
Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
whole new release?
Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs
in 4.01?
As I understand it (and not being a member of the release team),
Hi!
intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes:
Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) :
Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
whole new release?
Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs
in 4.01?
As I understand it (and
Cc'ing Michael (maintainer of quota).
Thanks, I didn't know a freeze exception for quota was asked for.
Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
whole new release?
Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs in 4.01?
There are not a
Hi Julien
Cc'ing Michael (maintainer of quota).
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 01:05:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
[...]
Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
whole new release?
I was looking at the bugs for release.debian.org for the wheezy
release and noticed
Hi Julien
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 01:05:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
The changelog diff is weird:
--- quota-4.00/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:01:05.0 +
+++ quota-4.01/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:01:06.0 +
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-quota (4.00-4) unstable;
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 17:21:32 +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package quota
http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/quota.html
The new version fixes Debian bug #685356,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package quota
http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/quota.html
The new version fixes Debian bug #685356, namely:
repquota: Fix reporting for XFS
Conversion to generic quota
11 matches
Mail list logo