Bug#690227: netatalk: 3.0.1 package

2014-08-27 Thread HAT
See http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Install_Netatalk_3.1.6_on_Debian_8_Jessie -- HAT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#690227: netatalk: 3.0.1 package

2014-08-27 Thread HAT
Hi, There is a new configure option "--with-init-style=debian-systemd" in netatalk 3.1.6 for Debian Jessie. Since netatalk 3.1.3 is old, use 3.1.6. -- HAT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d

Bug#690227: netatalk: 3.0.1 package

2013-03-18 Thread Igor Bernstein
Also, for your convenience here is a changelog since 2.2.2-1: https://github.com/igorbernstein/netatalk-debian/compare/debian/2.2.2-1...master On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Igor Bernstein wrote: > If its of any help, here is my attempt at packaging netatalk 3.0.1...its > my first attempt at

Bug#690227: netatalk: 3.0.1 package

2013-03-18 Thread Igor Bernstein
If its of any help, here is my attempt at packaging netatalk 3.0.1...its my first attempt at a debian package git://github.com/igorbernstein/netatalk-debian.git and here is a log of what I did: https://github.com/igorbernstein/netatalk-debian/wiki/Notes-(WIP) and a list of things I couldn't fig

Bug#690227: netatalk: 3.0.1 package

2012-11-10 Thread Dominic Evans
Any update on this? @jonas - are you planning to package yourself at some point, or are you still waiting for an acceptable patch to be submitted?

Bug#690227: netatalk: 3.0.1 package

2012-10-11 Thread Webmaster
Hello Yaname-san, Thank you for uploading the package. I checked it. 1. There is miss description in debian/control. 2. There are bad configure options in debian/rules 1. debian/control >> Due to Netatalk speaking AppleTalk, the print-server task can provide >> printing >> clients with full

Bug#690227: netatalk: 3.0.1 package

2012-10-11 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:57:03 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I will however only accept patches that stay CDBS. It is not helpful > for me that you switch to short-form dh, hoever nice it may be for you. Okay, I'll try it back to cdbs style. Then, what is the best for my first step, cou

Bug#690227: netatalk: 3.0.1 package

2012-10-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Hideki, On 12-10-11 at 08:38pm, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Upstream has released 3.0.1 and some users/developers has tried to > make unofficial deb package for their interest/purpose. And I want to > reduce their workload by update in Official repository. > > Now I've almost done it (however

Bug#690227: netatalk: 3.0.1 package

2012-10-11 Thread Hideki Yamane
Package: netatalk Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: HAT , webmas...@oichinote.com Hi Jonas, Upstream has released 3.0.1 and some users/developers has tried to make unofficial deb package for their interest/purpose. And I want to reduce their workload by update in Official repository. Now I'v