Bug#693457: unblock: ibus-table/1.4.99.20121012-1

2013-03-13 Thread intrigeri
Hi, (restoring the Cc list, in case it helps finding someone interested to help fix the situation.) Ma Xiaojun wrote (13 Mar 2013 00:42:39 GMT) : > OK, I'd say you are uninformed about the state of ibus-table. I've been repeatedly asking questions and was not answered until today, so no big wond

Bug#693457: unblock: ibus-table/1.4.99.20121012-1

2013-03-12 Thread Ma Xiaojun
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Closing. There has been no helpful response from the requestor or > maintainers since November, despite intrigeri's prompts. I can find no bug > that would be justification for an unblock, just this vague mention of the > Cangjie Chinese

Bug#693457: unblock: ibus-table/1.4.99.20121012-1

2013-03-12 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: close -1 On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:23:34PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > (Cc'ing all recent uploaders, in the hope that it helps finding an > acceptable solution.) Closing. There has been no helpful response from the requestor or maintainers since November, despite intrigeri's prom

Bug#693457: unblock: ibus-table/1.4.99.20121012-1

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, (Cc'ing all recent uploaders, in the hope that it helps finding an acceptable solution.) intrigeri wrote (26 Jan 2013 23:20:14 GMT) : > This version is not in unstable, so it cannot be unblocked. > If what you are asking for is a pre-upload approval instead of an > unblock, then I suggest at

Bug#693457: unblock: ibus-table/1.4.99.20121012-1

2013-01-26 Thread intrigeri
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi, (disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team, just trying to help.) Xiaojun Ma wrote (16 Nov 2012 17:18:42 GMT) : > Please unblock package ibus-table version 1.4.99.20121012-1. > It hasn't introduced ibus 1.4.99 dependency despite the version number > bumping. Fr