Hi Chris,
thanks for your answer. I guess this is sufficient.
Thanks for your work on obo-relations
Andreas.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:07:54AM -0800, Chris Mungall wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas
>
> For the new RO we made the code BSD and the content CC-BY 3.0. The content is
> the part that
Hi Andreas
For the new RO we made the code BSD and the content CC-BY 3.0. The content is
the part that is required by EMBOSS
http://code.google.com/p/obo-relations/
Is this sufficient for the old OBO_REL (http://obofoundry.org/ro)? Is my
agreement sufficient? Or do you need a license file emb
Hi Chris,
sorry for pinging again. Could you please issue some sign of live to
let us know whether we could hope for some license clarification or
whether we might need to seek for other people affiliated to OBO
Relation Ontology?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:06:10PM
Note the note at the top of the web page - OBO_REL is deprecated.
The new relation ontology is here:
http://code.google.com/p/obo-relations/
• Code license
• New BSD License
•
• Content license
• Creative Commons 3.0 BY
If you need to distribute the legacy one by all means do it, it should be CC
Hi Chris,
I hope you are fine and got my last mail. In case you might need some
time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to
give us some confirmation that you are working on this. Any response
from your side (or somebody else in charge for OBO Relation Ontology)
will
Hi Chris,
I'm writing you on the behalf of the Debian Med team which has included
the EMBOSS suite into official Debian distribution. The EMBOSS suite
does contain some files of the OBO Relation Ontology. I failed to find
any licensing or contact information at
http://obofoundry.org/ro/
but
6 matches
Mail list logo
