Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2014-01-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Ian Campbell [2014-01-16 08:29]: > Unless we can determine how to distinguish a 209 from a 109 it might > still have to be something which is enabled locally. Martin -- still no > word from QNAP I take it? Unfortunately, I haven't heard from QNAP. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2014-01-16 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 08:29 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > Unless we can determine how to distinguish a 209 from a 109 it might > still have to be something which is enabled locally. It took me about 2s from pressing send to wake up and realise that stopping the fan in the fan error hook might be th

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2014-01-16 Thread Ian Campbell
Thanks for the info, I'll figure some way to integrate that. Unless we can determine how to distinguish a 209 from a 109 it might still have to be something which is enabled locally. Martin -- still no word from QNAP I take it? I do have some code (in experimental) to ask via debconf when the sys

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2014-01-15 Thread Dermot O'Dwyer
The following appears to work OK in ts209.c: case 0x73: /* call_function("fan_error", ""); */ { unsigned char code = 0x30; serial_write(&code, 1); } break; No errors in logs. Th

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2014-01-09 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 09:46 +, Dermot O'Dwyer wrote: > On 3 January 2014 00:19, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Dermon, does commenting out the content of temp_high and temp_low in > > qcontrol.conf and rebooting still end up with fan_error getting called > > lots? > > Yes, fan_error still gets calle

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2014-01-09 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 09:46 +, Dermot O'Dwyer wrote: > On 3 January 2014 00:19, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Dermon, does commenting out the content of temp_high and temp_low in > > qcontrol.conf and rebooting still end up with fan_error getting called > > lots? > > Yes, fan_error still gets calle

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2014-01-09 Thread Dermot O'Dwyer
On 3 January 2014 00:19, Ian Campbell wrote: > Dermon, does commenting out the content of temp_high and temp_low in > qcontrol.conf and rebooting still end up with fan_error getting called > lots? Yes, fan_error still gets called when there are empty temp_high and temp_low functions. Dermot --

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2014-01-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Ian Campbell [2014-01-03 00:19]: > I suppose you never heard back? Correct; I'll ask again. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2014-01-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 14:05 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Ian Campbell [2013-08-15 10:19]: > > > I have a TS-209 and will try to find the time to check. Unfortuntely, > > > I cannot remember whether GPIO 44 also works on the Orion models. > > > > Did you have any luck with this? > > I sent

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2013-08-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Ian Campbell [2013-08-15 10:19]: > > I have a TS-209 and will try to find the time to check. Unfortuntely, > > I cannot remember whether GPIO 44 also works on the Orion models. > > Did you have any luck with this? I sent an email to QNAP a few days ago but haven't received a reply yet. -- M

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2013-08-15 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 15:42 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Dermot O'Dwyer [2013-07-06 02:38]: > > > It's possible that there is a GPIO e.g. you can distinguish TS-119 from > > > TS-219 via GPIO 44. Unless you've got a 209 to compare your 109 against > > > though I'm not sure how to find out. >

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2013-07-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Dermot O'Dwyer [2013-07-06 02:38]: > > It's possible that there is a GPIO e.g. you can distinguish TS-119 from > > TS-219 via GPIO 44. Unless you've got a 209 to compare your 109 against > > though I'm not sure how to find out. > > > > Perhaps Martin (CCd) has a 209 and/or can ask QNAP? > > The

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2013-07-05 Thread Dermot O'Dwyer
On 30 June 2013 15:58, Ian Campbell wrote: > In 0.4.2-7+wheezy2 the fan_error function would have been empty, so do > you know for sure it wasn't being triggered previously too? I reinstalled 0.4.2-7+wheezy2 and added beep to the fan error function. Got plenty of beeps so it would appear that it

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2013-06-30 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 01:54 +0100, Dermot O'Dwyer wrote: > Package: qcontrol > Version: 0.5.1-3 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > > On a TS109, after upgrading from 0.4.2-7+wheezy2 to 0.5.1-3 qcontrol then > reports fan error in syslog and beeping every minute approximately. How annoying!

Bug#712841: qcontrol: Fan error reported on TS109

2013-06-19 Thread Dermot O'Dwyer
Package: qcontrol Version: 0.5.1-3 Severity: important Tags: upstream On a TS109, after upgrading from 0.4.2-7+wheezy2 to 0.5.1-3 qcontrol then reports fan error in syslog and beeping every minute approximately. Setting SOUND_BUZZER=no in /etc/default/qcontrol does not stop the beeping. I have l