On Jul 21, Simon Lodal sim...@parknet.dk wrote:
I WANT to rename the interfaces.
I can create 70-persistent-net.rules manually, then it works perfectly. But
And it is how it is supposed to work, because your case is highly
uncommon.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital
I WANT to rename the interfaces.
I can create 70-persistent-net.rules manually, then it works perfectly.
But
And it is how it is supposed to work
Says who?
Not the man page for sure.
The functionality was there in squeeze. Could you point me to a changelog
entry that describes when
On Jul 21, Simon Lodal sim...@parknet.dk wrote:
The functionality was there in squeeze. Could you point me to a changelog
entry that describes when it was removed, and why?
If it worked in squeeze for some hypervisor then it was an error which
has been corrected.
--
ciao,
Marco
On Jul 20, Simon Lodal sim...@parknet.dk wrote:
No this is a bug. Why should interface renaming not work in virtual
machines?
Because their names are already stable.
You missed the point.
I WANT to rename the interfaces.
I can create 70-persistent-net.rules manually, then it works
No this is a bug. Why should interface renaming not work in virtual machines?
I have the same problem. For various reasons we have always renamed our
network interfaces to e0, e1, etc, both in physical and virtual machines
(kvm). What is wwrong with that?
On Jul 20, Simon Lodal sim...@parknet.dk wrote:
No this is a bug. Why should interface renaming not work in virtual machines?
Because their names are already stable.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: udev
Version: 175-7.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I have an virtual maschine (virtual box) with 4 network interfaces. It is
installed with the debian network ISO. I try to change the order of this
interfaces, but /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules don't exist. When
I create
7 matches
Mail list logo
