Simon McVittie writes:
> In the Debian package, the instrumentation is only present in the "debug
> build" (install dbus-1-dbg and add
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dbus-1.0/debug-build/lib to the
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH), not in the build that is normally used by the OS.
Huh, why isn't the valgrind stu
On mar, giu 24, 2014 at 07:05:12 -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Alessandro Ghedini writes:
>
> > On mar, giu 24, 2014 at 09:33:51 -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
>
> >> Well, I think I've figured it out; there are really *two* packages
> >> wanting to be split off, an Arch:all package and an Arch:a
On 25/06/14 00:05, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Yeah, I *did* notice that my changes won't just magically make things
> better for dbus; it would, in fact, require patching configure.ac there
> as well. However, what little mention I see of the pkg-config file on
> valgrind's bug tracker is skeptical a
Alessandro Ghedini writes:
> On mar, giu 24, 2014 at 09:33:51 -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
>> Well, I think I've figured it out; there are really *two* packages
>> wanting to be split off, an Arch:all package and an Arch:any package.
>
> This doesn't really solve anything though. AFAICT e.g. dbu
On mar, giu 24, 2014 at 09:33:51 -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Simon McVittie writes:
>
> > On 15/12/13 23:22, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >> While I still think this would be nice, it turned out to be a bit
> >> more difficult to implement (basically the pkg-config
Control: tags -1 + patch
Simon McVittie writes:
> On 15/12/13 23:22, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>> While I still think this would be nice, it turned out to be a bit
>> more difficult to implement (basically the pkg-config file is
>> generated at build time, and it can't be created if the configur
On 15/12/13 23:22, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> While I still think this would be nice, it turned out to be a bit
> more difficult to implement (basically the pkg-config file is
> generated at build time, and it can't be created if the configure
> stage fails).
Thanks for looking at this, anyway.
Control: reopen -1
Control: notfixed -1 valgrind/1:3.9.0-2
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:22:21PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> On mar, dic 03, 2013 at 11:56:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Package: valgrind
> > Version: 1:3.9.0-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> >
Control: tags -1 pending
On mar, dic 03, 2013 at 11:56:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: valgrind
> Version: 1:3.9.0-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It would be great if valgrind could ship memcheck.h and friends, and
> valgrind.pc, in a new valgrind-dev or valgrind-headers or something on al
Package: valgrind
Version: 1:3.9.0-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be great if valgrind could ship memcheck.h and friends, and
valgrind.pc, in a new valgrind-dev or valgrind-headers or something on all
architectures; then packages that consume them, like dbus, wouldn't have
to stay in sync with valg
10 matches
Mail list logo
