Hi,
As for your comment on ":", YES. It is a productive comment and I thank
you for that. It is fixed.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:13:04PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> On 2014-01-19 11:34, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> It depends on what exactly the problem is.
...
Problem should affects not just un
On 2014-01-19 11:34, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 07:08:21PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Osamu,
Thank you very much. Minor problem with the new version: there should
be something after "facts" - either a period, or - IMO most
appropriate - a colon. I personally do not like tha
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 07:08:21PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi Osamu,
> Thank you very much. Minor problem with the new version: there should
> be something after "facts" - either a period, or - IMO most
> appropriate - a colon. I personally do not like that sentence much for
> 2 reasons:
>
Hi Osamu,
On 2014-01-15 10:03, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
If there is no ticket on this issue, I don't think it's worth
mentioning in the reference.
Maybe my last response was a bit to strong and rude. Excuse me.
Please make sure to propose tangible alternative if you make critical
comments Let'
Hi,
> If there is no ticket on this issue, I don't think it's worth
> mentioning in the reference.
Maybe my last response was a bit to strong and rude. Excuse me.
Please make sure to propose tangible alternative if you make critical
comments Let's keep discussion constructive one.
I will repla
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:50:15PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> On 2014-01-13 10:00, Osamu Aoki wrote:
...
> >Historically, this issue was the reason behind release note mentioning
> >only apt-get dist-upgrade.
>
> If there is no ticket on this issue, I don't think it's worth mentioning in
>
On 2014-01-13 10:00, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 03:11:35PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Osamu,
...
NOTE: The package dependency resolver of the `aptitude` command tends to
suggest mass package removals when packages in `unstable` are
temporarily inconsistent. This sit
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 03:11:35PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi Osamu,
...
> >NOTE: The package dependency resolver of the `aptitude` command tends to
> >suggest mass package removals when packages in `unstable` are
> >temporarily inconsistent. This situation is a bit frightening.
> >
Hi Osamu,
On 2014-01-06 09:29, Osamu Aoki wrote:
control: tags 732956 pending
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 09:52:03PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Package: debian-reference-en
Version: 2.53
Severity: minor
Section 2.2.1. |apt-get| / |apt-cache| vs. |aptitude| contains:
The |apt-get| and |a
control: tags 732956 pending
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 09:52:03PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: debian-reference-en
> Version: 2.53
> Severity: minor
>
> Section 2.2.1. |apt-get| / |apt-cache| vs. |aptitude| contains:
>
> >The |apt-get| and |apt-cache| commands are the most *basic*
Package: debian-reference-en
Version: 2.53
Severity: minor
Section 2.2.1. |apt-get| / |apt-cache| vs. |aptitude| contains:
The |apt-get| and |apt-cache| commands are the most *basic* package management
tool.
The subject is plural while "the most *basic* package management tool" is
singular.
11 matches
Mail list logo