Re: Antonio Terceiro 2014-06-05 <20140605204216.ga...@debian.org>
> I'm confused; it's been almost 2 months since tests for postgresql-9.1
> were attempted:
> http://ci.debian.net/data/packages/unstable/amd64/p/postgresql-9.1/latest.json
I'm not sure about the timestamps, though DDPO was still sho
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:44:01AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: To Debian Bug Tracking System 2014-04-10
> <20140410132924.ga27...@msgid.df7cb.de>
> > on 2014-04-02, http://ci.debian.net/#package/postgresql-9.1 started
> > listing "9.3.4-1". That's clearly wrong; 9.3.4 is from
Re: To Debian Bug Tracking System 2014-04-10
<20140410132924.ga27...@msgid.df7cb.de>
> on 2014-04-02, http://ci.debian.net/#package/postgresql-9.1 started
> listing "9.3.4-1". That's clearly wrong; 9.3.4 is from a different
> source package postgresql-9.3.
Hi,
the "real" bug behind this is that
Package: debci
Severity: normal
Hi,
on 2014-04-02, http://ci.debian.net/#package/postgresql-9.1 started
listing "9.3.4-1". That's clearly wrong; 9.3.4 is from a different
source package postgresql-9.3.
The buildlogs in turn show that postgresql-9.1 9.1.13-1 is being
downloaded.
A second incarna
4 matches
Mail list logo