Hi Steve,
firstly, thanks a lot for your valuable feedback and the time you took to
investigate this.
Quoting Steve Langasek (2015-09-12 04:12:56)
> In bug #752270, Peter refers to the "Feedback arc set" section of
> http://bootstrap.debian.net/amd64/ . Reviewing the information at
>
Hi again,
Quoting Johannes Schauer (2015-09-12 10:26:50)
> 2. missing metadata
>
> The way we find source packages to modify with build profiles changed
> since this bug was filed more than a year ago, mainly due to Helmuts
> (CC-ed) work on rebootstrap. The heuristics we
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 11:06:28AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> looking at the rebootstrap source, it seems freetype is part of the source
> packages that have to be crossed:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/helmutg/rebootstrap.git/tree/bootstrap.sh#n3257
>
> Furthermore, it seems
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Peter, Johannes,
I have been preparing a new upload of freetype to Debian unstable, and was
about to include these patches. I am very much a fan of bootstrappability
of the archive, and would like to help move this forward.
However, I have to say that it's been very
Control: block -1 by 763766
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 02:30:15 +0300 Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote:
As promised, here's the second part of the patch; it adds build profile
annotations to the control file and simplifies the changes to the rules
file a bit. There's a little catch: since
Quoting Johannes Schauer (2014-10-07 11:21:50)
the syntax for the Build-Profiles field was changed during the bootstrap
sprint in paris [1,2]. Attached patch is updated to reflect those changes.
It only changes debian/control.in so please regenerate debian/control.
please ignore the list
Source: freetype
Version: 2.5.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
As promised, here's the second part of the patch; it adds build profile
annotations to the control file and simplifies the changes to the rules
file a bit. There's a little catch: since the build profile-aware
versions of the
7 matches
Mail list logo