Le 17/02/2016 13:14, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) a écrit :
On 17 February 2016 at 01:21, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
About Debian Bug #756599 [1], I found this explanation [2][3] confirming
that * is not a selector :
I've removed the stray "*" (commit 4a66305922b197)
Thanks for
tags 756599 fixed-upsteam
thanks
On 17 February 2016 at 01:21, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> About Debian Bug #756599 [1], I found this explanation [2][3] confirming
> that * is not a selector :
I've removed the stray "*" (commit 4a66305922b197)
Thanks for the
Hello Michael,
About Debian Bug #756599 [1], I found this explanation [2][3] confirming
that * is not a selector :
strtod recognizes four special input strings. The strings "inf" and
"infinity" are converted to , or to the largest representable
value if the floating-point format doesn’t
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 3.65-1
Severity: minor
The printf(3) manpage reads:
The C99 standard specifies [-]inf or [-]infinity for infinity, and a
string starting with nan for NaN, in the case of f conversion, and
[-]INF or [-]INFINITY or NAN* in the case of F conversion.)
Please
Jakub,
I do not know the details here, but are you sure this is wrong? The
preceding part of the sentence says [and a string starting with nan
for NaN, in the case of f conversion], and I take the * to mean a
wildcard pattern match, analogous with [a string starting with nan
for NaN]. This is
Hi Micheal,
Thanks for the quick reply!
* Michael Kerrisk mtk.manpa...@gmail.com, 2014-07-31, 12:16:
I do not know the details here, but are you sure this is wrong? The
preceding part of the sentence says [and a string starting with nan
for NaN, in the case of f conversion], and I take the *
Could you make this character italic, to make it clear it is not literal?
Without being sure of the details, I am reluctant to make any change.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
7 matches
Mail list logo