Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-31 Thread David Wright
Quoting Phillip Susi (ps...@ubuntu.com): [...] > Let me make sure I've got this right: you have two different entries > in /etc/fstab that correspond to the same partition, and one of them > says it is fat? Yes. Years ago, it contained: # root filesystem /dev/hda1 / ext2 ... 0 1 ... some lines ..

Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-30 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/30/2014 11:28 AM, David Wright wrote: Let me make sure I've got this right: you have two different entries in /etc/fstab that correspond to the same partition, and one of them says it is fat? I suppose that explains it then: fsck has to pick o

Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-30 Thread David Wright
Quoting Phillip Susi (ps...@ubuntu.com): > > That is very odd... what happens if you manually try running fsck -N > on this partition? Well, that revealed what's going on. west ~# fsck -N /dev/sda1 fsck from util-linux 2.25.1 [/sbin/fsck.vfat (1) -- /media/vfat-a1] fsck.vfat /dev/sda1 west ~# f

Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-29 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/2014 1:11 PM, David Wright wrote: > Quoting Andreas Henriksson (andr...@fatal.se): >> [...] >> >> # udevadm info -n /dev/whatever1 -q property | grep ID_FS_TYPE >> >> ...and... >> >> # blkid -p /dev/whatever1 > > west ~# udevadm info -n /d

Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-29 Thread David Wright
Quoting Andreas Henriksson (andr...@fatal.se): > [...] > > # udevadm info -n /dev/whatever1 -q property | grep ID_FS_TYPE > > ...and... > > # blkid -p /dev/whatever1 west ~# udevadm info -n /dev/sda1 -q property | grep ID_FS_TYPE ID_FS_TYPE=ext3 west ~# blkid -p /dev/sda1 /dev/sda1: LABEL="john

Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-29 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 07:46:04PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: [...] > I see, very strange. With Davids latest followup I would say things are just getting more and more strange. findmnt reports ext* in the filesystem column, which comes from case COL_FSTYPE: str = xstrdup

Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-29 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hi David! Just adding back the bug report to CC so we get all information recorded and available to everyone interested in investigating it. Please use reply-to-all in future followups. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 06:06:39PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > Quoting Andreas Henriksson (andr...@fatal.se):

Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-28 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/28/2014 05:19 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:50:16PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: >> You appear to be using systemd so I believe the problem would be >> there. util-linux's fsck is only used with sysvinit. > > Thats

Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-28 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello David Wright. Thanks for your bug report! On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:21:59PM -0500, David Wright wrote: [...] > My jessie/sid laptop's root filesystem, partition 1, is no longer > fsck'd at reboot. After issuing a message, fsck then appears to try > and run a FAT fsck on what is an ext3 fil

Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-28 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Control: reassign -1 util-linux 2.25.1-5 On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:50:16PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: > You appear to be using systemd so I believe the problem would be > there. util-linux's fsck is only used with sysvinit. Thats not true. systemd-fsck is just a simple wrapper launching util-li

Bug#767163: util-linux: root partition not being fsck'd

2014-10-28 Thread David Wright
Package: util-linux Version: 2.25.1-5 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, My jessie/sid laptop's root filesystem, partition 1, is no longer fsck'd at reboot. After issuing a message, fsck then appears to try and run a FAT fsck on what is an ext3 filesystem that mounts as such. This started happenin