On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 20:15 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 08:02:33PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The main reason for asking for preapproval is I am trying to decide whether
> > to
> > also include a fix for #771249 which is an update to
Hi,
Le 17/12/2014 18:28, Ian Campbell a écrit :
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 18:12 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>> FWIW, the last patch proposed in #771249 was optimized WRT the size of
>> the diff:
>
> How was this optimization done?
The translation project uses msgmerge with the --previous flag, and
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 18:12 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Le 17/12/2014 16:59, Ian Campbell a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 20:15 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 08:02:33PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> The main reason for askin
Le 17/12/2014 16:59, Ian Campbell a écrit :
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 20:15 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 08:02:33PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> The main reason for asking for preapproval is I am trying to decide whether
>>> to
>>> also
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 08:02:33PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The main reason for asking for preapproval is I am trying to decide whether to
> also include a fix for #771249 which is an update to the upstream
> translations.
> Would that be acceptable or not?
Tricky...
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock d-i
Version 2.02~beta2-18 (in Jessie, unblocked by #772959) added a new debconf
template.
A call for translations has been sent out which is has a deadline of the 21st,
I'd like to upload -
6 matches
Mail list logo
