On 2015-04-24 20:19, Justin B Rye wrote:
> (Oops, slightly delayed by a powercut. Hurrah for FS journals.)
>
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> +
>> + Samba4 requires exec-bit to permit files to be open for
>> execution
>> +
>
> s/open/opened/, and I don't think people say "exec-bit" (just
> "executa
(Oops, slightly delayed by a powercut. Hurrah for FS journals.)
Niels Thykier wrote:
> +
> + Samba4 requires exec-bit to permit files to be open for
> execution
> +
s/open/opened/, and I don't think people say "exec-bit" (just
"executable bit").
Samba4 requires executable bit to permit
Control: tags -1 pending
On 2015-04-24 18:22, Mario Lipinski wrote:
> Package: release-notes
>
> Hi,
>
> Jessie will release with Samba 4 containing lots of changes. While the
> default configuration will be mostly backwards compatible I belief the
> following change noteworthy in the release no
Package: release-notes
Hi,
Jessie will release with Samba 4 containing lots of changes. While the
default configuration will be mostly backwards compatible I belief the
following change noteworthy in the release notes: Windows may ask to
"open a file for execution". While with Samba 3 this wa
4 matches
Mail list logo
