Bug#786611: Possible fix

2015-10-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Sat, 2015-10-03 at 16:35 -0400, Philippe Grégoire wrote: > > I have been genuinely interested in adopting a package, for a while. > > Quite frankly, I only played with iscsitarget for a couple of minutes > as > I am planning to replace my current NAS setup. Considering the > integration of

Bug#786611: Possible fix

2015-10-03 Thread Philippe Grégoire
Hi, Ubuntu got it fixed already with iscsitarget-1.4.20.3+svn499-0ubuntu2.1 You might want to try and apply their fix-build-3.19.patch (removing the changes to the Makefile). Is it possible to have this bug acknowledged and the patch included? Thanks, P. Grégoire

Bug#786611: Possible fix

2015-10-03 Thread Philippe Grégoire
Forgot to mention Ubuntu's bug report number: 1483415. On 2015-10-03 11:12, Philippe Grégoire wrote: Hi, Ubuntu got it fixed already with iscsitarget-1.4.20.3+svn499-0ubuntu2.1 You might want to try and apply their fix-build-3.19.patch (removing the changes to the Makefile). Is it possible

Bug#786611: Possible fix

2015-10-03 Thread Philippe Grégoire
On 2015-10-03 14:32, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Perhaps I should have started with you. :-) Would you be interested in (co)-maintaining it Philippe ? I have been genuinely interested in adopting a package, for a while. Quite frankly, I only played with iscsitarget for a couple of minutes as I

Bug#786611: Possible fix

2015-10-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Sat, 2015-10-03 at 23:56 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > > Is it possible to have this bug acknowledged and the patch > included? > > Actually, I'm thinking of orphaning the package and asking its > removal > from the Debian archive. There's hardly any activity on the mailing > list.

Bug#786611: Possible fix

2015-10-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Sat, 2015-10-03 at 11:12 -0400, Philippe Grégoire wrote: > Hi, > > Ubuntu got it fixed already with iscsitarget-1.4.20.3+svn499- > 0ubuntu2.1 > > You might want to try and apply their fix-build-3.19.patch (removing > the changes to the Makefile). > They should have submitted it upstream. Or