Hello,
Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
[...]
> > > > That means avr-gcc will be upgraded to the atmel release 3.5.0 based on
> > > gcc
> > > > 4.9.2 soon.
> > > soon = ?
> > Within a week or three...
>
> That's totally fine. This thing won't happen before for sure.
This is fine for me too!
Be
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:40:51PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 08:26:24PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > > That means avr-gcc will be upgraded to the atmel release 3.5.0 based on
> > gcc
> > > 4.9.2 soon.
> > soon = ?
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 08:26:24PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > That means avr-gcc will be upgraded to the atmel release 3.5.0 based on
> gcc
> > 4.9.2 soon.
>
> soon = ?
>
Within a week or three...
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 08:26:24PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> That means avr-gcc will be upgraded to the atmel release 3.5.0 based on gcc
> 4.9.2 soon.
soon = ?
> Will that help? Otherwise my suggestion would be that we
> introduce a new package, say avr-gcc5, that we base on the gnu release
> 5.
Hi,
the archlinux avr-gcc seams to be a standard unpatched gcc compiled for the
avr target. I would prefere to base the main avr-gcc package on the atmel
releases as those have historically been of higiher quality for avr usage.
That means avr-gcc will be upgraded to the atmel release 3.5.0 based o
reassign 790103 gcc-avr 1:4.8.1+Atmel3.4.5-1
retitle 790103 gcc-avr: base on a newer version of gcc
affects 790103 expeyes
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:35:46AM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> > > 3- rebase the package gcc-avr on a newer version of gcc, which may be a
> > >hard work. Such a wor
Hi Mattia,
Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:46:37PM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> > Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
> > > From our builds, we can only see 4 packages which fail to build due to
> > > this: [...]
> > > expeyes
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/790103
> [...
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:46:37PM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
> > From our builds, we can only see 4 packages which fail to build due to
> > this: [...]
> > expeyes
> > https://bugs.debian.org/790103
>
> The reason why expeyes FTBFS, is that the flag -Wd
Hi Mattia,
Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
> ...
> We now think this is the right time to enable this flag by default.
> From our builds, we can only see 4 packages which fail to build due to
> this: [...]
> expeyes
> https://bugs.debian.org/790103
The reason why expeyes FTBFS, is that the f
9 matches
Mail list logo