On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:39 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Abort. I just wasted a few hours on this (luckily while doing other
> stuff). I am not going to split libjags, libjags-dev off but simply rebuild
> depending on g++ (>= 4:5.2).
>
> Chris can then depend on this version, and that is all th
On 8 August 2015 at 09:03, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 8 August 2015 at 14:34, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
| | On 8 August 2015 at 13:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
| | > However, instead of being properly split out as required by
| | > policy, the libraries are shipped as part of the 'jags' binary
On 8 August 2015 at 16:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
| On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 09:06:35 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| >
| > Related question, though: how do I chroot/pbuilder build against
experimental?
| >
| > I am only setup for unstable. I'd rather not create a new chroot just for
| > th
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 09:06:35 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Related question, though: how do I chroot/pbuilder build against
> experimental?
>
> I am only setup for unstable. I'd rather not create a new chroot just for
> this. Is there another way?
>
You don't need to build against
Related question, though: how do I chroot/pbuilder build against experimental?
I am only setup for unstable. I'd rather not create a new chroot just for
this. Is there another way?
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
On 8 August 2015 at 14:34, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
| On 8 August 2015 at 13:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
| > However, instead of being properly split out as required by
| > policy, the libraries are shipped as part of the 'jags' binary package,
| > which makes this a bit of a pain.
|
| On Sat, Aug
On 8 August 2015 at 13:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
> However, instead of being properly split out as required by
> policy, the libraries are shipped as part of the 'jags' binary package,
> which makes this a bit of a pain.
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 06:50:44AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> I don't
On 8 August 2015 at 13:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
| Control: severity -1 serious
| Control: tag -1 confirmed
|
| On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 13:10:42 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
|
| > Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the
| > C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not b
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 13:10:42 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the
> C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries.
> Packages which are built with g++-5 fr
9 matches
Mail list logo
