Bug#796118: Re: Should djbdns be removed?

2016-02-10 Thread Matija Nalis
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 06:00:40PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: > Matija Nalis wrote: > > dnscache component only is RC-buggy. The solution has been proposed > > by Robert Edmonds (remove only buggy component /usr/bin/dnscache). > > > > It is not upstream orphaned. > > As far as I can tell, the

Bug#796118: Re: Should djbdns be removed?

2016-02-09 Thread Robert Edmonds
Hi, Matija: Matija Nalis wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:26:49PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:29:18PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 05:45:30PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > > djbdns is RC-buggy for many years now and

Bug#796118: Re: Should djbdns be removed?

2015-11-09 Thread Matija Nalis
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:26:49PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:29:18PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 05:45:30PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > djbdns is RC-buggy for many years now and was out of testing since 2009. > > > >

Bug#796118: Re: Should djbdns be removed?

2015-10-06 Thread Ondřej Surý
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:29:18PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 05:45:30PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > djbdns is RC-buggy for many years now and was out of testing since 2009. > > > Should we remove it from unstable? > > No, I don't think so. Any solid