Bug#801727: pugixml: Please package pugixml variant with wchar enabled

2022-02-23 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello William On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 23:14:23 -0400 Bill Blough wrote: block 801727 by 911805 thanks I looked at this a little back when we discussed it, but it looked like it was going to take more time than I had right then, so I put it off. I recently had time to dig into this properly, but h

Bug#801727: pugixml: Please package pugixml variant with wchar enabled

2018-10-24 Thread Bill Blough
block 801727 by 911805 thanks I looked at this a little back when we discussed it, but it looked like it was going to take more time than I had right then, so I put it off. I recently had time to dig into this properly, but have hit a snag. After several hours of testing and tweaking, and readin

Bug#801727: pugixml: Please package pugixml variant with wchar enabled

2018-07-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, >I'm not sure. This is why I suggested a separate version which could be >marked as conflicting with the existing verison. This would at least guarantee >that existing reverse dependencies wouldn't break. I realize now that this >probably isn't a simple as it sounds. >If it's an ABI chan

Bug#801727: pugixml: Please package pugixml variant with wchar enabled

2018-07-30 Thread Bill Blough
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:39:15PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:30:15 -0400 William Blough wrote: > > Source: pugixml > > Severity: wishlist > > > > The passwordsafe package uses pugixml, but requires wchar to be enabled. > > If a > > wchar enabled versi

Bug#801727: pugixml: Please package pugixml variant with wchar enabled

2018-07-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:30:15 -0400 William Blough wrote: > Source: pugixml > Severity: wishlist > > The passwordsafe package uses pugixml, but requires wchar to be enabled. If a > wchar enabled version (see pugiconfig.hpp) was included along side the > current > version, I could remove

Bug#801727: pugixml: Please package pugixml variant with wchar enabled

2017-07-11 Thread Bill Blough
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:40:53PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > Hey William, > > Very very sorry about such a delayed response. No worries. > > William Blough writes: > > > Source: pugixml > > Severity: wishlist > > > > The passwordsafe package uses pugixml, but requires wchar to be enabled

Bug#801727: pugixml: Please package pugixml variant with wchar enabled

2017-07-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hey William, Very very sorry about such a delayed response. William Blough writes: > Source: pugixml > Severity: wishlist > > The passwordsafe package uses pugixml, but requires wchar to be enabled. If a > wchar enabled version (see pugiconfig.hpp) was included along side the > current > ver

Bug#801727: pugixml: Please package pugixml variant with wchar enabled

2015-10-13 Thread William Blough
Source: pugixml Severity: wishlist The passwordsafe package uses pugixml, but requires wchar to be enabled. If a wchar enabled version (see pugiconfig.hpp) was included along side the current version, I could remove the embedded copy of pugixml from passwordsafe and depend on the packaged versio