Ian Cordasco writes:
> If you'd like to develop patches to make backporting requests without
> backporting the necessary version of urllib3, that's fine. I don't
> think there should be a policy of carrying unnecessary unsupported
> patches that will likely cause more bug reports than not.
To ex
On Jan 23, 2016 11:54 PM, "Brian May" wrote:
>
> Ian Cordasco writes:
>
> > If you'd like to develop patches to make backporting requests without
> > backporting the necessary version of urllib3, that's fine. I don't
> > think there should be a policy of carrying unnecessary unsupported
> > patch
Ian Cordasco writes:
> If you'd like to develop patches to make backporting requests without
> backporting the necessary version of urllib3, that's fine. I don't
> think there should be a policy of carrying unnecessary unsupported
> patches that will likely cause more bug reports than not.
You d
3 matches
Mail list logo
