On 01/24/2016 01:32 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Requests has a policy of only supporting one version of urllib3. As
> such, Debian attempting to be less restrictive will result in Debian
> having to carry patches for those versions of urllib3 which Requests
> will not support. The
On Sunday, January 24, 2016 12:13:38 PM Daniele Tricoli wrote:
> So, an upload of urllib3 1.13.1-2 (note the Debian revision bump)
> will be fine. Right now it's not.
It's better I clarify more:
s/will be fine/will not need a new upload of requests/.
--
Daniele Tricoli 'eriol'
Hello all,
On Sunday, January 24, 2016 12:28:37 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> python-requests (build-)dependencies on urllib3 are too restrictive, in a
> way which doesn't allow backporting without tweaking (build-)dependencies.
Yes I realized that myself, but James Page already reported this issue
Ian Cordasco writes:
> If you'd like to develop patches to make backporting requests without
> backporting the necessary version of urllib3, that's fine. I don't
> think there should be a policy of carrying unnecessary unsupported
> patches that will likely cause more
On Jan 23, 2016 11:54 PM, "Brian May" wrote:
>
> Ian Cordasco writes:
>
> > If you'd like to develop patches to make backporting requests without
> > backporting the necessary version of urllib3, that's fine. I don't
> > think there should be a policy
Ian Cordasco writes:
> Requests integrates tightly with urllib3. Trying to use an older version of
> the dependency (or a newer version) can wreak havoc. Try using requests
> 2.2.1 and urllib3 1.10 or 1.11. The right constraint is necessary to
> prevent Debian from
Package: python-requests
Version: 2.9.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi there,
python-requests (build-)dependencies on urllib3 are too restrictive, in a
way which doesn't allow backporting without tweaking (build-)dependencies.
Instead of writing something like this:
python-urllib3 (= 1.13.1-1)
please
Hi Thomas,
Requests has a policy of only supporting one version of urllib3. As
such, Debian attempting to be less restrictive will result in Debian
having to carry patches for those versions of urllib3 which Requests
will not support. The Requests project has already made accommodations
with
Ian Cordasco writes:
> If you'd like to develop patches to make backporting requests without
> backporting the necessary version of urllib3, that's fine. I don't
> think there should be a policy of carrying unnecessary unsupported
> patches that will likely cause more
9 matches
Mail list logo