On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 09:01:48PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Since 1.18.something dpkg can handle unpacking of 1.18.15, and since
> dpkg 1.19.0 it also creates them. yes it was a issue back then but now
> it's correctly handled, and dak accepts them since last week.
More info in this
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:45:56AM +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 823190 + pending
> thanks
>
> Fixed in Git, pending upload:
Errr, no.
Since 1.18.something dpkg can handle unpacking of 1.18.15, and since
dpkg 1.19.0 it also creates them. yes it was a issue back then but now
it's correctly
tags 823190 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=2f1efb44994b066c22a985c09a853fc9583aacf8
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Hi Guillem,
> […]
Thanks for the explanation :)
> The report would still make sense for anything targetting a stable
> release though, so it perhaps still has some merit?
I'll leave the question of closing it up to you but I'll at least bump
this bug down my own "priority" list.
Thanks again.
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:17:05AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> But at this point I'm not sure if the report makes sense anymore, as
> I might as well enable signatures for format 1.0, given that stable
> supports unpacking those now. Thanks for the "accidental" reminder. :)
Except that IIRC the
Hi!
On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 23:00:44 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > It would be nice if lintian could error out when finding an orig
> > tarball signature on source format 1.0 packages.
> >
> > The pattern for the signature is «.orig.tar.gz.asc».
>
> Where are these files stored? Am I confusing this
Hi Guillem,
> It would be nice if lintian could error out when finding an orig
> tarball signature on source format 1.0 packages.
>
> The pattern for the signature is «.orig.tar.gz.asc».
Where are these files stored? Am I confusing this with
debian/upstream-signing-key.asc … ?
Regards,
--
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.44
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
With dpkg 1.18.5, orig tarball signatures for format 1.0 will be
accepted for extraction and building, which means stable systems will
not be able to extract them. Extraction of orig taball signatures for
format >= 2.0 have been accepted
8 matches
Mail list logo
