Bug#824931: similar to bug #824931

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:37:32PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > While I still think that this would be the most generally useful > semantics for other inetd-started daemons, I can see how it could > surprise telnet/rsh users. It surely also suprises ftp users, samba users and

Bug#824931: similar to bug #824931

On Jun 06, Marc Lehmann wrote: > The maintainer already said that this is the correct behaviour, so this No, I did not: I explained that I wanted to better understand your setup to determine what the default semantics should be. In the case of #824931 the problem is that it

Bug#824931: similar to bug #824931

I just wanted to add a note that this bug is very similar to bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824931 in openbsd-inet. There also, only when running under systemd, all processes started directly or indirectly via inetd get killed (for example, when I apt-get install'd rlinetd