Bug#832643: mini-buildd: Please provide options for repository structure similar to official repo

在 2016年11月4日星期五 SGT 下午12:29:43，您写道： > So, 1.0.25... > > * Fixes this, so these uploads actually build ;). > * Adds error handling against ambiguity in Meta-Distributions. > * Adds "debdev" repository wizard (and some extra test builds) to my > personal testing gear. * Adds some more doc about

Bug#832643: mini-buildd: Please provide options for repository structure similar to official repo

Hi Boyuan again, On So, 2016-10-23 at 20:50 +0200, Stephan Sürken wrote: > Hi Boyuan, > > On So, 2016-10-23 at 15:53 +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > (...) > > > > Several months have passed since last update. Still I think this is > > something (...) > No, I don't think so. From your description

Bug#832643: mini-buildd: Please provide options for repository structure similar to official repo

Hi Boyuan, On So, 2016-10-23 at 15:53 +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: (...) > Several months have passed since last update. Still I think this is > something (...) > Just as the log says in the previous email (20160731), we would meet > > Package

Bug#832643: mini-buildd: Please provide options for repository structure similar to official repo

Hello Stephan, Several months have passed since last update. Still I think this is something important and we are able to make further improvements: 2016-07-31 19:02 GMT+08:00 Stephan Sürken : > Iiuuc ;), there actually is such a thing via the Layout (see extra > options).

Bug#832643: mini-buildd: Please provide options for repository structure similar to official repo

> fwiw, there is also the "portext" command, letting you do "no changes > ports" just from a DSC-URL to any mini-buildd distribution. That looks great. The documentation said barely nothing about portext except auto-generated python docs, so it would be better if we document it further :-) > >>

Bug#832643: mini-buildd: Please provide options for repository structure similar to official repo

Hi Boyuan, On Do, 2016-07-28 at 09:47 +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Source: mini-buildd > Version: 1.0.14 > Severity: wishlist > > I got a little bit confused when first heard of the CODENAME-ID- > SUITE[-ROLLBACK] distuibution name. That is weird. I understand that > there may > be multiple

Bug#832643: mini-buildd: Please provide options for repository structure similar to official repo

Source: mini-buildd Version: 1.0.14 Severity: wishlist I got a little bit confused when first heard of the CODENAME-ID- SUITE[-ROLLBACK] distuibution name. That is weird. I understand that there may be multiple instances and packages may conflict. But this requires adjustments of d/changelog,