On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:59:14AM +0200, Peter Dreuw wrote:
> looks like there is still a small issue with the hashes with the squeeze
> packages list:
>
> apt does complain about the hash checksum of
>
> http://ftp.skolelinux.org/skolelinux/dists/squeeze/local/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
sigh
>
[Holger Levsen]
> Hi Petter,
>
> please fix:
>
> IOError: [Errno 28] No space left on device
>
> on /opt on a.s.n and notify me once done…
Fixed. As we discussed on IRC, this was caused by a large "upload speed
testing" file being left in our upload directory. Holger removed it and
I disabled
Hi,
> It does involve creating a chroot, editing sources.list and running "apt
> update"… if you already have a wheezy chroot, you can skip the first
> step.
>
> If you file bugs (and demand fixes from volunteers), you should be
> prepared to spend a few minutes to help those analysing+fixing
Hi Petter,
please fix:
IOError: [Errno 28] No space left on device
on /opt on a.s.n and notify me once done…
background: so I verified that indeed the hashing tools (shaXsum,
md5sum) work correctly on a.s.n and that the Packages file indeed has
the wrong values and then I ran dinstall
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > > >does apt complain as well?
> > > I did not try.
> > then please do.
> That would mean installing Debian Edu squeeze and updating. I honestly do not
> have time for that.
It does involve creating a chroot, editing sources.list
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 19:15:33 CEST Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:46:03PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > >does apt complain as well?
> >
> > I did not try.
>
> then please do.
That would mean installing Debian Edu squeeze and updating. I honestly do not
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:46:03PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> >does apt complain as well?
> I did not try.
then please do.
> Honestly, there is no way you can deny the bug exists. And it obviously
> exists for everyone downloading the list file now.
I'm not denying the bug, I'm trying to
Hi,
>> Yes, I can.
>
>for wheezy and squeeze or wheezy only?
>
>> And everyone can - it's plainly visible by simply casting a glance at
>the hashes in the file.
>
>does apt complain as well?
I did not try. Honestly, there is no way you can deny the bug exists. And it
obviously exists for
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:26:40PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> >+first of all, let me say I'm surprised noone else noticed this before.
> >Can someone reproduce this issue?
> Yes, I can.
for wheezy and squeeze or wheezy only?
> And everyone can - it's plainly visible by simply casting a
Hi,
>+first of all, let me say I'm surprised noone else noticed this before.
>Can someone reproduce this issue?
Yes, I can.
And everyone can - it's plainly visible by simply casting a glance at the
hashes in the file.
-nik
--
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
package: src:debian-edu-install
severity: important
x-debbugs-cc: Peter Dreuw , Dominik George
Hi,
please see inline for some questions to this bug report…
+first of all, let me say I'm surprised noone else noticed this before.
Can someone
11 matches
Mail list logo