Hello,
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 05:43:29PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Oh, and: had you considered recommending `gbp dch' ?
I decided to limit the contents of dgit-maint-gbp(7) to the
dgit-specific parts of the workflow. People already have their gbp
workflows, possibly involving `gbp dch`, and
Hello Ian,
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 05:26:32PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your excellent contributions. I rewrote my own
> wip.tutorials branch to have non-nonsense commit messages, rebased
> your branch on top, and made two new commits of my own:
> - to fix some missing
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#840153: Feedback, and dgit-maint-gbp(7) [and 1
more messages]"):
> Thanks a lot for your excellent contributions. I rewrote my own
> wip.tutorials branch to have non-nonsense commit messages, rebased
> your branch on top, and made two ne
Reading dgit-maint-gbp(7), I see this:
INCORPORATING NMUS
% dgit --gbp pull
Will this actually work ? I think it will apply the changes from the
NMU both to debian/patches/ and to the actual files. This will risk
conflicts in the upstream files (if previous patches touch the
Thanks a lot for your excellent contributions. I rewrote my own
wip.tutorials branch to have non-nonsense commit messages, rebased
your branch on top, and made two new commits of my own:
- to fix some missing quotes in a dch rune in dgit-nmu-simple
- to add a `local-pod-man' convenience
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#840153: Feedback, and dgit-maint-gbp(7) [and 1 more
messages]"):
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 09:47:42PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Oh! Would you care to separate out the ones you would like me to
> > take, into their own (sub) branch ?
>
&
Hello Ian,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 09:47:42PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#840153: Feedback, and dgit-maint-gbp(7)"):
> > I should say that there are some commits on my branch that I didn't
> > explicitly suggest cherry-picking in my previous e-mail. Most of them I
>
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#840153: Feedback, and dgit-maint-gbp(7)"):
> I should say that there are some commits on my branch that I didn't
> explicitly suggest cherry-picking in my previous e-mail. Most of them I
> added after sending that e-mail. Apologies if that's inconvenient.
Oh!
8 matches
Mail list logo
