Bug#841959: Problems with your ismrmrd/1.3.2-4.1 NMU

2016-11-04 Thread Gilles Filippini
On 2016-11-04 15:50, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Hi Gilles, On 01/11/16 17:50, Gilles Filippini wrote: Could you give me more insight of the compatibility problem with HDF5 1.10? The most important change in the HDF5 1.10 release is that the hid_t type was changed from 'int' to 'long long' [1].

Bug#841959: Problems with your ismrmrd/1.3.2-4.1 NMU

2016-11-04 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Hi Gilles, On 01/11/16 17:50, Gilles Filippini wrote: Could you give me more insight of the compatibility problem with HDF5 1.10? The most important change in the HDF5 1.10 release is that the hid_t type was changed from 'int' to 'long long' [1]. Assuming that hid_t is int isn't true anymore.

Bug#841959: Problems with your ismrmrd/1.3.2-4.1 NMU

2016-11-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 01/11/16 17:50, Gilles Filippini wrote: Could you give me more insight of the compatibility problem with HDF5 1.10? The most important change in the HDF5 1.10 release is that the hid_t type was changed from 'int' to 'long long' [1]. Assuming that hid_t is int isn't true anymore. Thus the

Bug#841959: Problems with your ismrmrd/1.3.2-4.1 NMU

2016-11-01 Thread Gilles Filippini
Hi Ghislain, Ghislain Vaillant a écrit le 01/11/2016 à 17:13 : > Thanks for dealing with the HDF 1.10 compatibility for ismrmrd whilst I > was away. I did not have the opportunity to look at your patch before > your submission today. That's unfortunate, as there are a couple of > problems with

Bug#841959: Problems with your ismrmrd/1.3.2-4.1 NMU

2016-11-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Hi Gilles, Thanks for dealing with the HDF 1.10 compatibility for ismrmrd whilst I was away. I did not have the opportunity to look at your patch before your submission today. That's unfortunate, as there are a couple of problems with it. First, you changed the API by modifying the