Hi Gergely,
thanks for your message.
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:45:25 +0100
Gergely Risko wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Sorry, don't have the time to followup on the whole discussion again.
>
> As many times I told Shlomi Fish, I'm happy to help with this package,
> but yes, I have a
Hello Shlomi, you need to make the package build against sid in less than one
day.:q
vi
I did the changes and I'm attaching them here, lots of conflicts between
fcs_enums.h and patsolve-shlomif/patsolve/fcs_enums.h
fcs_dllexport.h and patsolve-shlomif/patsolve/fcs_dllexport.h
(I'm removing
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:12:01PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Andrey, do you agree with me? you started the review, I don't want to steal
> your package
> or break rules too much :)
I didn't look into the packaging, only into the diff between versions,
feel free to continue reviewing
Hello
>This makes me angry and disappointed. I reported
>https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841445 many months ago and
>posted "ping replies" and nothing was done to resolve it - either by the
>maintainer, who was missing-in-action and not for the first time - or by a
>different
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 19:56:37 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Oh, and as this NMU doesn't deserve a short delay, it will miss stretch
> and so should be uploaded to experimental until the freeze is over, unless
> I'm miscalculating.
>
This makes me angry and disappointed. I
Control: retitle -1 RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-0.1 NMU
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 19:52:06 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:44:03PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > should I send a new NMU request based on that or can this ticket be reused
> > for it as well?
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:44:03PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> should I send a new NMU request based on that or can this ticket be reused for
> it as well?
You can reuse this RFS ticket for the package you just uploaded, you
should retitle it though. And you still need to follow the NMU
Oh, and as this NMU doesn't deserve a short delay, it will miss stretch
and so should be uploaded to experimental until the freeze is over, unless
I'm miscalculating.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Andrey,
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:25:11 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Please read and follow
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
>
> Your debian/patches/debian-changes is full of conflict markers, this
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please read and follow
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
Your debian/patches/debian-changes is full of conflict markers, this is
unacceptable and also means you did something wrong.
B-D changes are not reflected in d/changelog.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freecell-solver"
* Package name: freecell-solver
Version : 4.8.0-1
Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish
* URL :
11 matches
Mail list logo