On Tue 2017-02-07 13:00:31 -0500, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> I need to output extra debugging in the cron job, but I need some extra
> time to set some testing environment.
please report back when you have that info!
> For example, does using ssh trigger the creation of the agent now,
> simply because
On Mon, Feb 06 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> gpg --batch -qe -r keyid "$@"
>
> sure, but what's the "$@" ? Is it guaranteed to be a simple file name?
> or could it be more gpg options?
I left that out in a copy-paste, but it's empty. There are no extra args
to given to gpg that I didn't
On Mon 2017-02-06 11:32:06 -0500, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Can you give me the exact invocation? If the agent is being
>> queried/auto-launched when it doesn't need to be, that'd be something
>> worth asking GnuPG upstream to take a look at.
>
>
On Mon 2017-02-06 12:34:36 -0500, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> These are all single processes just waiting.
>>> So for gpg purposes, the agent is working as intended.
>>> However, I'm perplexed as of why I have so many running.
>>
>> I guess all of this could
On Mon, Feb 06 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> These are all single processes just waiting.
>> So for gpg purposes, the agent is working as intended.
>> However, I'm perplexed as of why I have so many running.
>
> I guess all of this could be solved if gnupg-agent was using
> exit-on-idle (with some
Am 06.02.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Yuri D'Elia:
> On Sat, Feb 04 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Can you give me the exact invocation? If the agent is being
>> queried/auto-launched when it doesn't need to be, that'd be something
>> worth asking GnuPG upstream to take a look at.
>
> Nothing
On Sat, Feb 04 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Can you give me the exact invocation? If the agent is being
> queried/auto-launched when it doesn't need to be, that'd be something
> worth asking GnuPG upstream to take a look at.
Nothing fancy. The command line is:
gpg --batch -qe -r keyid
On Sat 2017-02-04 09:06:12 -0500, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> What are you doing with gpg? if whatever you're doing needs the secret
>> keyring, the agent will be launched. if it doesn't need the secret
>> keyring, the agent will not be launched.
>
>
On Sat, Feb 04 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> What are you doing with gpg? if whatever you're doing needs the secret
> keyring, the agent will be launched. if it doesn't need the secret
> keyring, the agent will not be launched.
In one instance, I have a couple of gpg --batch processes that
On Fri 2017-02-03 09:02:47 -0500, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> When gpg is used via command line, the agent is started automatically
>>> and then it's left sitting there. But for a system without seats, the
>>> agent doesn't make sense. It shouldn't be
On Fri, Feb 03 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> When gpg is used via command line, the agent is started automatically
>> and then it's left sitting there. But for a system without seats, the
>> agent doesn't make sense. It shouldn't be running.
>
> That doesn't make sense. Even if you stop the
Am 03.02.2017 um 14:45 schrieb Yuri D'Elia:
> On Fri, Feb 03 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> I'm quite happy about the listening sockets by default on desktop, but
>>> on servers it's exactly the opposite. And masking is currently
>>
>> What's the problem with having them started on servers? Those
On Fri, Feb 03 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I'm quite happy about the listening sockets by default on desktop, but
>> on servers it's exactly the opposite. And masking is currently
>
> What's the problem with having them started on servers? Those are UNIX
> sockets, not something which is
Am 03.02.2017 um 13:45 schrieb Yuri D'Elia:
> On Fri, Feb 03 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> I wouldn't change anything for stretch and keep the status quo.
>>
>> And as already said, once we have support for user services in i-s-h,
>> this can be revisited post stretch.
>
> i-s-h?
>
> So the
On Fri, Feb 03 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I wouldn't change anything for stretch and keep the status quo.
>
> And as already said, once we have support for user services in i-s-h,
> this can be revisited post stretch.
i-s-h?
So the reasoning here is that dh-systemd doesn't support presetting
Am 03.02.2017 um 02:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>
> I wouldn't change anything for stretch and keep the status quo.
>
And as already said, once we have support for user services in i-s-h,
this can be revisited post stretch.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in
Am 03.02.2017 um 02:08 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
> Hi Yuri--
>
> On Wed 2017-02-01 17:25:44 -0500, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
>> Package: gnupg-agent
>> Version: 2.1.18-3
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> According to upstream, it's incorrect to ship user/sockets.target.wants/*
>> files
>> directly, as those
Hi Yuri--
On Wed 2017-02-01 17:25:44 -0500, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> Package: gnupg-agent
> Version: 2.1.18-3
> Severity: normal
>
> According to upstream, it's incorrect to ship user/sockets.target.wants/*
> files
> directly, as those cannot be disabled by the administrator.
>
> Quote:
>
> ...
18 matches
Mail list logo
