Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

2017-04-21 Thread Roger Shimizu
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo Dear Sean, On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:36:24 -0700 Sean Whitton wrote: > I'd like to note that I'm planning to upload with dgit, so you shouldn't > rebase after the upload. It's okay to rebase before the upload. Understand. I always cut the

Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

2017-04-20 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Roger, On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:10:52AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > And I pushed my fixes to branch qa_upload2. > (I removed the final releasing commit of branch qa_upload, and added update > commit) I'd like to note that I'm planning to upload with dgit, so

Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

2017-04-19 Thread Roger Shimizu
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo Dear Gianfranco, Thanks for your detailed explanation! On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:39:00 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello Roger, > > > >Targeting t-p-u need pre-approval from release team, while targeting > >unstable doesn't. >

Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

2017-04-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello Roger, >Targeting t-p-u need pre-approval from release team, while targeting >unstable doesn't. > true >I didn't targeting t-p-u. What I meant was if: >- my upload to unstable don't get unblock permission from release >team >- the original version of this package in stretch get a new RC

Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

2017-04-19 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:01:56 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > > >Secondly, testing-proposed-updates is highly inconvenient for the > >release team. It requires manual intervention and slows everything > >down. So we shouldn't upload to unstable

Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

2017-04-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, >Secondly, testing-proposed-updates is highly inconvenient for the >release team. It requires manual intervention and slows everything >down. So we shouldn't upload to unstable unless we *expect* it to be >unblocked. also, TPU means that semi-automatic bug reports (e.g. piuparts, ftbfs

Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

2017-04-18 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:10:52AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > Thanks for your review! No problem. > I think these are all simple fix that suitable for stretch. > The policy don't require pre-approval to upload to unstable [0]. > > If the unblock is rejected, and

Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

2017-04-18 Thread Roger Shimizu
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo Dear Sean, Thanks for your review! Very helpful. And I pushed my fixes to branch qa_upload2. (I removed the final releasing commit of branch qa_upload, and added update commit) Package also re-uploaded to DoM amd64 and mentors. On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:37:20 -0700 Sean

Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

2017-04-18 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Roger, On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 08:25:16PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "equivs" Thanks for working on all these improvements and fixes. Here is a review of 9818bd99a15efbbbf37eace90480f69e682f2e8f: - Shouldn't this

Bug#860466: RFS: equivs/2.0.10 [QA] -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

2017-04-17 Thread Roger Shimizu
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "equivs" * Package name: equivs Version : 2.0.10 Upstream Author : Debian Native Package * URL :